ArticlePolymers2025
Computational Environmental Impact Assessment of an Enhanced PVC Production Process.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Poly(vinyl chloride) (PVC) is one of the most widely used polymers due to its strength, low cost, and light weight. Industrial production is mainly conducted by suspension polymerization, which facilitates the control of the emissions of vinyl chloride monomer (VCM), a known carcinogen. However, the process consumes large amounts of water and energy and generates residual compounds such as polyvinyl alcohol (PVA) and polymerization initiators, which must be properly managed to mitigate environmental impacts. To improve sustainability, this study applied mass- and energy-integration strategies together with a zero-liquid-discharge (ZLD) water-regeneration system that uses sequential aerobic and anaerobic reactors to recirculate process water with reduced PVA. Although these measures reduce resource consumption, they can displace or intensify other impacts; therefore, a comprehensive evaluation of the system is necessary. Accordingly, the objective of this study is to quantify and compare the potential environmental impacts (PEIs) of the improved PVC production process through a scenario-based assessment using a waste reduction algorithm (WAR). This is applied to four operating scenarios in order to identify the stages and flows that contribute most to the environmental burden. According to our literature review, there is limited published evidence that simultaneously combines mass/energy integration and a ZLD system in PVC processes; thus, this work provides an integrated assessment useful for industrial design. The environmental performance of the improved process was evaluated using WAR GUI software (v 1.0.17, which quantifies PEIs in categories such as toxicity, climate change, and acidification. Four scenarios were compared: Case 1 (excluding both product and energy), Case 2 (product only), Case 3 (energy only), and Case 4 (product and energy). The total PEI increased from 2.46 PEI/day in Case 1 to 6230 PEI/day in Case 4, with the largest contributions from acidification (5140 PEI/day) and global warming (496 PEI/day), mainly due to natural gas consumption (5184 GJ/day). In contrast, Cases 1 and 2 showed negative PEI values (-3160 and -2660 PEI/day), indicating that converting the toxic VCM (LD
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.