ArticlePolymers2025
Comparative Analysis and Predictive Modeling of Wear Performance of Glass- and Bamboo Fiber-Reinforced Nanoclay-Epoxy Composites Using RSM and ANN.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Optimizing abrasive wear in sustainable MCC reinforced hemp bamboo epoxy composites for tribological applications.Scientific reports · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This research contributes to the field of materials engineering through an analysis of the wear performance of both glass fiber-reinforced epoxy composites (GFEC) and bamboo fiber-reinforced epoxy composites (BFEC). This study aims to assess the wear performance, defined by mass loss, of the composites under various factors: load, speed, time, nanoclay content, and composite type. Specimens are subjected to wear tests by a pin-on-disc tribometer. Composite wear performance is studied through Response Surface Methodology (RSM) and Artificial Neural Networks (ANN) as predictive models. Experimental runs are planned based on the Box-Behnken design of RSM to present a regression model that is then checked with an ANOVA analysis; afterwards, training and testing are performed using an ANN model to improve predictive accuracy. As per the results, GFEC exhibits lower mass loss compared to BFEC. For both of the composites, the mass loss is drastically reduced by the addition of nanoclay. The addition of nanoclay has more pronounced effects on BFECs than on GFECs. ANN predictions are found to be better in agreement with the experimental values compared to those derived from the RSM model. Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) analysis provides insight into wear mechanisms. This study demonstrates the effectiveness of a statistical and machine learning approach in optimizing wear performance in composite materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.