ArticlePolymers2025
Carbon Footprint of Plastic Bags and Polystyrene Dishes vs. Starch-Based Biodegradable Packaging in Amazonian Settlements.
Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
C footprint is a feature used to search the integral life cycle of a product to predict its environmental impact. The packaging industry is changing rapidly to the production of biodegradable products to mitigate the negative environmental consequences of the use of single-use packages. It is thought that biodegradable packages should be more sustainable than traditional plastics due to the sources of the raw materials used to produce them, but this is not always true and depends on the issues considered, the methodology, and the scale analyzed. Limited research includes case studies from developing countries where waste management is less efficient and where the environmental impacts of single-use packaging can be more significant. This paper evaluates the C footprint of bags and dishes made from traditional or local biodegradable sources in an Amazonian settlement of Colombia, such as thermoplastic cassava starch and powdered plantain leaves, to evaluate the impact of locally made biodegradable packaging vs. imported petrochemical ones. Results show that using local raw materials and in situ production reduces the C footprint of biodegradable packages, considering that the energy source for production and transport are important contributors to the C footprint beyond the raw materials used, with ratios that can be between 0.1 and 7 times more kg CO
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.