Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41470917›Full record

ArticlePolymers2025

Carbon Footprint of Plastic Bags and Polystyrene Dishes vs. Starch-Based Biodegradable Packaging in Amazonian Settlements.

Johanna Garavito, Néstor C Posada, Clara P Peña-Venegas, Diego A Castellanos

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Polymers, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Johanna GaravitoFood Packaging and Shelf Life Laboratory, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 Número 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Néstor C PosadaFood Packaging and Shelf Life Laboratory, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 Número 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.
Clara P Peña-VenegasInstituto Amazónico de Investigaciones Científicas-SINCHI, Avenida Vásquez Cobo Calle 15/16, Leticia 910001, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0001-6317-3767
Diego A CastellanosFood Packaging and Shelf Life Laboratory, Instituto de Ciencia y Tecnología de Alimentos, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 Número 45-03, Bogotá 111321, Colombia.ORCID 0000-0002-8412-3985

Funding

Ministerio de Ciencia, Tecnología e Innovación BPIN2018000100062
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

C footprint is a feature used to search the integral life cycle of a product to predict its environmental impact. The packaging industry is changing rapidly to the production of biodegradable products to mitigate the negative environmental consequences of the use of single-use packages. It is thought that biodegradable packages should be more sustainable than traditional plastics due to the sources of the raw materials used to produce them, but this is not always true and depends on the issues considered, the methodology, and the scale analyzed. Limited research includes case studies from developing countries where waste management is less efficient and where the environmental impacts of single-use packaging can be more significant. This paper evaluates the C footprint of bags and dishes made from traditional or local biodegradable sources in an Amazonian settlement of Colombia, such as thermoplastic cassava starch and powdered plantain leaves, to evaluate the impact of locally made biodegradable packaging vs. imported petrochemical ones. Results show that using local raw materials and in situ production reduces the C footprint of biodegradable packages, considering that the energy source for production and transport are important contributors to the C footprint beyond the raw materials used, with ratios that can be between 0.1 and 7 times more kg CO

Indexed as

biodegradabilitycarbon emissionplastic wastesingle-use packagingsustainability

Identifiers

PMID41470917
PMCPMC12737126

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.