ReviewNutrients2025
Ultra-Processed Foods and Inflammatory Bowel Disease: A Narrative Review of Epidemiology, Mechanisms, and Dietary Implications.
Review in Nutrients, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Ultra-processed food intake and risk of digestive system cancers: a systematic review and dose-response meta-analysis.Frontiers in nutrition · 2026Pooled it
- Beyond Nutrients: NOVA-Defined Dietary Patterns in Crohn's Disease and Healthy Adults.Nutrients · 2026Trial
- Erythritol Exacerbates DSS-Induced Colitis and Influences Behavioral Responses in Mice Through Gut Microbiota and Metabolic Alterations.Microorganisms · 2026Article
- Combined Synbiotics and Omega-3 Polyunsaturated Fatty Acids Enhance Clinical and Histological Recovery in DSS-Induced Ulcerative Colitis: An Experimental Study in Rats.Diseases (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Link between ultra-processed foods and drinks intake, gut microbiota and inflammation: an exploratory analysis in adult volunteers.Nutrition journal · 2026Observational
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Ultra-processed foods (UPFs), industrial formulations rich in refined substrates and additives, have been increasingly examined as plausible contributors to gut dysbiosis and mucosal inflammation relevant to inflammatory bowel disease (IBD). This narrative review synthesizes epidemiological, mechanistic, and interventional evidence on UPF intake and IBD based on a structured literature search from 2010 to 2025. Large-scale prospective cohorts consistently associate higher UPF intake with increased risk of Crohn's disease (CD), whereas findings for ulcerative colitis (UC) remain weaker or inconsistent. Among individuals with established IBD, observational data suggest that greater UPF consumption correlates with higher disease activity and relapse, although potential confounding and reverse causation must be considered. Preclinical studies demonstrate that specific UPF constituents-including emulsifiers, carrageenan, maltodextrin, microparticles, and excess dietary salt-can disrupt epithelial barrier integrity, alter the gut microbiota, and activate immune pathways, providing biological plausibility while underscoring translational gaps. Interventional evidence, particularly for exclusive enteral nutrition and the Crohn's Disease Exclusion Diet, suggests clinical benefit from reducing UPFs or selected additives, mainly in CD, though data in adults and UC remain limited. Overall, current evidence indicates that dietary strategies to limit UPF exposure may represent a promising and modifiable component of IBD management. Future research should prioritize standardized exposure assessment, mechanism-based human trials, and personalized nutrition approaches to refine clinical applicability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.