Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41470738›Full record

ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Feeding Preferences of Giant Pandas May Reflect the Detection of Specific Volatiles and Bitter-Tasting Metabolites in Bamboo Leaves as Markers of Nutritional Status.

Chao Bai, Yuyan You, Yanhui Liu, Haihong Xu, Yuanyuan Zhang, Guoyu Shan, Ali Wu, Liu Yang, Nan Ding, Yan Lu and 5 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Computer Simulation of Tooth Wear in Giant Pandas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Chao BaiBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technologies, Beijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Yuyan YouBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technologies, Beijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.ORCID 0000-0002-9607-4236
Yanhui LiuBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Haihong XuBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Yuanyuan ZhangBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Guoyu ShanShanxi Changqing National Nature Reserve Administration, Hanzhong 723000, China.
Ali WuShanxi Changqing National Nature Reserve Administration, Hanzhong 723000, China.
Liu YangShanxi Changqing National Nature Reserve Administration, Hanzhong 723000, China.
Nan DingBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Yan LuBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technologies, Beijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Ting JiaBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Yanping LuBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Yipeng CongBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Chenglin ZhangBeijing Key Laboratory of Captive Wildlife Technologies, Beijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.
Xuefeng LiuBeijing Zoo, Beijing 100044, China.

Funding

the Beijing Park Management Center ZX2020011
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Giant pandas feed preferentially on bamboo but choose different species and organs depending on factors such as the altitude and season, suggesting preferential selection according to their nutritional requirements. However, the mechanism of selection is unclear. Pandas cannot directly sense the nutritional quality of bamboo shoots but tend to sniff their food before consumption, inferring that odors inform their choice, which is then reinforced by the selection of positive and negative taste cues. To investigate the basis of selection, we observed the effects of 10 different bamboo species on feeding behavior, including food item selection, feeding frequency, portion size, food processing time per bite, and amount consumed per meal. Three of the bamboos were preferred, another four were consumed when the preferable bamboos were unavailable, and the remaining three were always rejected. We then characterized the volatile components of the bamboo leaves as well as the primary and secondary metabolites, allowing us, for the first time, to correlate feeding behavior with metabolomics. The three groups shared some volatile compounds but 21 volatiles were unique to the preferred leaves and appeared to confer sweet and fresh aromas, whereas the inedible leaves produced 20 unique volatiles that were pungent or floral, which appeared to discourage feeding. The three groups also shared many common nonvolatile metabolites, but pairwise comparisons revealed both qualitative and quantitative differences in metabolite abundance that resulted in the preferred leaves accumulating compounds associated with a sweet taste in humans (e.g., sugars), while the inedible leaves contained metabolites often associated with sour and bitter tastes (e.g., certain flavonoids and acids). Following attraction by certain volatiles, giant pandas may therefore consolidate their selection of leaves that are potentially more nutritious by consuming those with sweeter, less bitter and less sour tastes.

Indexed as

bamboofeeding preferences of giant pandasmetabolitesvolatiles

Identifiers

PMID41470738
PMCPMC12737210

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.