ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Feeding Preferences of Giant Pandas May Reflect the Detection of Specific Volatiles and Bitter-Tasting Metabolites in Bamboo Leaves as Markers of Nutritional Status.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Computer Simulation of Tooth Wear in Giant Pandas (Animals : an open access journal from MDPI · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Giant pandas feed preferentially on bamboo but choose different species and organs depending on factors such as the altitude and season, suggesting preferential selection according to their nutritional requirements. However, the mechanism of selection is unclear. Pandas cannot directly sense the nutritional quality of bamboo shoots but tend to sniff their food before consumption, inferring that odors inform their choice, which is then reinforced by the selection of positive and negative taste cues. To investigate the basis of selection, we observed the effects of 10 different bamboo species on feeding behavior, including food item selection, feeding frequency, portion size, food processing time per bite, and amount consumed per meal. Three of the bamboos were preferred, another four were consumed when the preferable bamboos were unavailable, and the remaining three were always rejected. We then characterized the volatile components of the bamboo leaves as well as the primary and secondary metabolites, allowing us, for the first time, to correlate feeding behavior with metabolomics. The three groups shared some volatile compounds but 21 volatiles were unique to the preferred leaves and appeared to confer sweet and fresh aromas, whereas the inedible leaves produced 20 unique volatiles that were pungent or floral, which appeared to discourage feeding. The three groups also shared many common nonvolatile metabolites, but pairwise comparisons revealed both qualitative and quantitative differences in metabolite abundance that resulted in the preferred leaves accumulating compounds associated with a sweet taste in humans (e.g., sugars), while the inedible leaves contained metabolites often associated with sour and bitter tastes (e.g., certain flavonoids and acids). Following attraction by certain volatiles, giant pandas may therefore consolidate their selection of leaves that are potentially more nutritious by consuming those with sweeter, less bitter and less sour tastes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.