ArticlePlants (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Combining Hyperspectral Imaging with Ensemble Learning for Estimating Rapeseed Chlorophyll Content Under Different Waterlogging Durations.
Article in Plants (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Chlorophyll content is a key physiological indicator reflecting photosynthetic capacity, and the Soil-Plant Analysis Development (SPAD) meter is a commonly used tool for its rapid and non-destructive estimation. Hyperspectral imaging (HSI) is a non-destructive technique that captures fine spectral characteristics and thus holds great potential for high-throughput phenotyping and early stress detection. This study aimed to explore the potential of HSI combined with ensemble learning (EL) to estimate SPAD of rapeseed seedlings under different durations of waterlogging. Hyperspectral images and corresponding SPAD values were collected from six rapeseed cultivars at 0, 2, 4 and 6 days of waterlogging. The mutual information was employed to select the top 30 most relevant spectral and vegetation index features. The EL model was constructed using partial least squares, support vector machine, random forest, ridge regression and elastic net as the first-layer learners and a multiple linear regression as the second-layer learner. The results showed that the EL model showed superior stability and higher prediction accuracy compared to single models across various genotypes and waterlogging treatment datasets. As waterlogging duration increased, the overall model accuracy improved; notably, under 6 days of waterlogging, the EL model achieved an
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.