ArticleMicromachines2025
Design and Validation of a Brain-Controlled Hip Exoskeleton for Assisted Gait Rehabilitation Training.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study presents an integrated micro-system solution to address the challenges of gait instability in patients with impaired hip motor function. We developed a novel wearable hip exoskeleton, where a flexible support unit and a parallel drive mechanism achieve self-alignment with the biological hip joint to minimize parasitic forces. The system is driven by an active brain-computer interface (BCI) that synergizes an augmented reality visual stimulation (AR-VS) paradigm for enhanced motor intent recognition with a high-performance decoding algorithm, all implemented on a real-time embedded processor. This integration of micro-sensors, control algorithms, and actuation enables the establishment of a gait phase-dependent hybrid controller that optimizes assistance. Online experiments demonstrated that the system assisted subjects in completing 10 gait cycles with an average task time of 37.94 s, a correlated instantaneous rate of 0.0428, and an effective output ratio of 82.17%. Compared to traditional models, the system achieved an 18.64% reduction in task time, a 28.31% decrease in instantaneous rate, and a 7.36% improvement in output ratio. This work demonstrates a significant advancement in intelligent micro-system platforms for human-centric rehabilitation robotics.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.