ArticleMicromachines2025
Effect of Random Base Vibrations on the Performance of Piezoelectric Wind Energy Harvesters.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Piezoelectric wind energy harvesters can collect a small amount of energy from wind without the need for rotary equipment. In practice, such harvesters can be excited concurrently by wind-induced and base vibrations. In this study, combined wind and base excitation is investigated, with a focus on random base vibrations and the effect of the bandwidth of band-limited random excitation, thereby filling the research gap between results obtained with wide-band random excitation and those with harmonic excitation. Since flow-induced vibrations can produce several phenomena, in this research, galloping and vortex-induced vibration (VIV) harvesters are considered due to their structural similarity and the ease with which a galloping harvester can be converted into a VIV harvester (and vice versa). Both numerical and experimental results are presented. First, the mathematical models are given; then, experimental tests validate the models and provide an insight into the phenomena; finally, numerical simulations extend the dissertation by providing a more in-depth analysis of the behavior of such harvesters. The results show that above the critical wind velocity, galloping harvesters are not affected by the amplitude and bandwidth of random base excitation. In contrast, VIV harvesters in the lock-in condition are affected by random base excitation, especially if the vibration amplitude is large and if its spectrum is concentrated in a narrow band centered about the resonance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.