ReviewMicromachines2025
Research Progress on Personalized Bone Implants Based on Additive Manufacturing.
Review in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Digital Workflow in Craniofacial Bone Tissue Engineering: From Cone-Beam Computed Tomography (CBCT) to Personalized Bioceramic Implants.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Research Progress on the Structure and Properties of Medical Bone Implants Based on Additive Manufacturing.Micromachines · 2026Review
- Bioactive PLA Filament with Antibacterial and Ion-Releasing Properties for Additive Manufacturing of Bone Scaffolds: QbD-Guided Development.Pharmaceutics · 2026Article
- Manufacturing of Bioinspired SS316L-Based Multimaterials: Processing, Mechanical Properties and Modeling.Micromachines · 2026Article
- Three-Dimensional Printing and Personalized Bioceramic Scaffolds for Dental and Maxillofacial Applications: A Narrative Review.Dentistry journal · 2026Review
- Multiscale Interface Engineering for Orthopedic and Dental Implants: A Review.Journal of functional biomaterials · 2026Review
- Quantifying Stress Shielding in Dental Implants: A Comparative Finite Element Study of Titanium, CFR-PEEK, and Ceramic Materials.Materials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Personalized bone implants based on additive manufacturing are gradually emerging as a significant development direction in orthopedic restoration. By precisely matching anatomical structures and the functional requirements of patients, they demonstrate notable clinical advantages. Research progress in structural design, material selection, fabrication processes, and performance evaluation has been systematically outlined around the core research chain of personalized bone implants. Personalized design methods, material selection criteria, and the applicability of different additive manufacturing processes are analyzed in detail. The performance indicators of the implant are further comprehensively evaluated. The promoting role of multi-performance materials and intelligent manufacturing technology in complex bone repair functions has been revealed. The development of artificial intelligence transforms clinical data into long-term performance prediction models, further driving in-depth research in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.