ArticleMicromachines2025
Numerical Simulation and Experimental Verification of Multi-Probe Cryoablation.
Article in Micromachines, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This paper addresses the challenges of ice ball shape prediction and layout optimization in multi-probe cryoablation treatment through a comprehensive study integrating both simulation and experimental approaches. A three-dimensional numerical model of multi-probe cryoablation, coupled with phase change heat transfer, was developed using the Pennes bioheat equation. The model's accuracy in predicting core physical phenomena, such as phase change processes and multi-probe thermal field superposition, was initially validated. The simulated and experimentally measured temperature profiles, along with the macroscopic ice ball shapes, were observed to be in excellent agreement (with an average error of 3.75% in the major and minor axes of the ice ball). Additionally, it was determined that a nine-probe layout with 1 cm probe spacing was optimal for generating a uniform low-temperature field. However, histological analysis of porcine liver tissue revealed inconsistencies between the model's predicted damage boundaries and the actual observed diffuse biological damage transition zone, indicating the limitations of steady-state models relying solely on fixed critical damage threshold temperatures for accurately predicting the cell death region. This study not only provides a rigorously validated thermal-physical prediction tool for preoperative planning but also underscores the importance of incorporating time-temperature thermal dose effects into future models to bridge the gap from physical simulation to biological damage prediction, thus laying a crucial foundation for the development of precise cryoablation technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.