ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Elastic-Plastic Deformation Analysis of Cantilever Beams with Tension-Compression Asymmetry of Materials.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
In the elastic-plastic analysis of structures, the deformation problem of cantilever beams is a classical problem, in which it is usually assumed that the material constituting the beam has an identical elastic modulus and identical yield strength when it is tensioned and compressed. These characteristics are manifested graphically as the symmetry of tension and compression. In this work, we will give up the general assumption and consider that the material has the property of tension-compression asymmetry, that is, the material presents different moduli in tension and compression and different yield strengths in tension and compression. First, the elastic-plastic response of the cantilever beam with a concentrated force acting at the fixed end in the loading stage is theoretically analyzed. When the plastic hinge appears at the fixed end, the maximum deflection at the free end is derived, and in the unloading stage the residual deflection at the free end is also given. At the same time, the theoretical solution obtained is validated by the numerical simulation. The results indicate that when considering the tension-compression asymmetry of materials, the plastic zone length from the fixed end no longer keeps the classical value of 1/3 and will become bigger; the tension-compression asymmetry will enlarge the displacement during the elastic-plastic response; and the ultimate deflection in loading and the residual deflection in unloading are both greater than the counterparts in the classical problem. The research results provide a theoretical reference for the fine analysis and optimal design of cantilever beams.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.