ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Composite Structure as a Stress Wave Barrier Zone Under Impulse Loading: Microscale Numerical Analysis of Attenuation.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the design factors of stress wave barrier zones intended for manufacturing machines under impulse loading, using polymer discontinuously reinforced composites with specified internal microstructures, which effectively suppress stress at the wave front, promote uniform stress distribution, improve impact resistance, and reduce vibrations and noise. Two-dimensional representative unit cells and explicit finite element simulations were used to analyze stress wave propagation under impulse loading. The effects of inclusion shape, orientation, distribution, interlayer, and size of the interface on stress wave scattering and attenuation were examined. In our models, hollow inclusions demonstrated 20.6% higher attenuation compared to solid inclusions, with the hollow fiber inclusion showing the most significant improvement. Inclusion orientation relative to the stress wave direction affected attenuation by 18.5%, while redistribution of inclusions and addition of a compliant interlayer contributed additional increments of 3-11%. These results highlight the critical role of microscale topology in stress barrier zone designing, such that the combined adjustment of inclusion shape, orientation, interlayer presence, and spatial distribution provides an effective strategy to maximize stress wave attenuation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.