ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Numerical Investigation on Tensile and Compressive Properties of 3D Four-Directional Braided Composites.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This study investigates the influence of braiding angles on the mechanical behavior and damage mechanisms of three-dimensional (3D) braided composites under uniaxial compressive and tensile loading. By integrating uniaxial compression and tension tests with finite element (FE) analysis, the relationships between mesoscale damage initiation, propagation, and the macroscopic mechanical properties were revealed. Results demonstrate that the 3D4d-20° model exhibits higher stiffness and compressive strength but lower compressive failure strain compared to the 3D4d-40° model, attributed to differences in fiber spatial arrangement and matrix cracking propagation. Conversely, the 3D4d-40° model shows enhanced tensile performance but greater matrix-dominated damage under tension. Moreover, as the braiding angle increases, the ratio of tensile strength to compressive strength in 3D braided composites decreases accordingly. Comparative analysis of damage evolution pathways reveals that smaller braiding angles (20°) initiate damage earlier under compression, while larger angles (40°) promote transverse fiber bundle failure and matrix degradation. This research not only elucidates the underlying microscale damage mechanisms of 3D braided composites under compression loading but also highlights the differences in damage patterns between compressive and tensile loading, providing theoretical foundations for structural design and performance optimization of such composite materials. Future work will focus on incorporating interfacial effects and manufacturing-induced defects to refine the model further.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.