ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
Machine Learning-Driven Multi-Objective Optimization of Bead Geometry and Energy Efficiency in Laser-Arc Hybrid Additive Manufacturing.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Laser-arc hybrid additive manufacturing (LAHAM) combines the benefits of arc-based deposition and laser precision but involves complex, nonlinear process interactions that challenge the prediction and control of bead geometry and energy consumption. This study develops a machine learning (ML) framework to predict bead width, height, and Deposition volume per unit energy (DVUE) in LAHAM. Using experimental data, multiple regression models-including Support Vector Regression, Gaussian Process Regression, Neural Networks, and XGBoost-were trained and evaluated. Gaussian Process Regression (GPR) demonstrated superior performance in capturing nonlinear relationships and was further optimized using Bayesian Optimization and Particle Swarm Optimization. The optimized GPR models were integrated with the NSGA-II multi-objective optimization algorithm to simultaneously minimize geometric deviations and maximize DVUE. Results show that the proposed approach effectively identifies Pareto-optimal process parameters, achieving a balance between deposition accuracy and energy utilization rate, thereby providing a reliable and intelligent strategy for process optimization in hybrid additive manufacturing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.