ArticleMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025
3D Printed Beam with Optimized Internal Structure-Experimental and Numerical Approach.
Article in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This article compares the results of numerical and experimental analysis of the mechanical properties of an optimized 3D-printed beam. The samples were subjected to a four-point bending test, and corresponding numerical models were created at the same time. The beams were printed using 3D printing and their weight was reduced by using an internal spatial grid with variable thickness that gradually increases towards the outer walls. This approach allows for effective optimization of material strength while minimizing raw material consumption during production. One of the key findings is the determination of the ultimate strength between fibers, the mode of failure, and the high agreement between the experimental results and the numerical model using the finite element method. The optimized beam achieved nearly 60% weight reduction while maintaining comparable load-bearing capacity. The knowledge gained opens up new possibilities in the field of materials engineering and also makes a significant contribution to the methodology of developing and optimizing these structures using 3D printing technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.