Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41470275›Full record

ReviewMaterials (Basel, Switzerland)2025

Mechanical Behavior and Performance Degradation of Structural Cables in Buildings: A Comprehensive Review.

Xu Chen, Hai Zhang, Hongbo Liu, Jianshuo Wang, Yutong Zhang, Liulu Guo, Zhihua Chen, Marta Kosior-Kazberuk, Julita Krassowska

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Materials (Basel, Switzerland), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Xu ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
Hai ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
Hongbo LiuSchool of Civil Engineering, Hebei University of Engineering, Handan 056038, China.
Jianshuo WangSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
Yutong ZhangSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Liulu GuoSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin University, Tianjin 300072, China.
Zhihua ChenSchool of Civil Engineering, Tianjin Chengjian University, Tianjin 300384, China.
Marta Kosior-KazberukDepartment of Building Structures and Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-8171-2242
Julita KrassowskaDepartment of Building Structures and Structural Mechanics, Faculty of Civil Engineering and Environmental Sciences, Bialystok University of Technology, 15-351 Bialystok, Poland.ORCID 0000-0001-9209-1285

Funding

National Key R&D Program of China Grant No. 2023YFC3805601National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 52378175National Natural Science Foundation of China Grant No. 52408204Tianjin Natural Science Foundation Youth Project Grant No. 23JCQNJC00410
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Owing to their lightness, high strength, flexibility, and design adaptability, cables have been extensively employed in architectural engineering. As cables are primary load-bearing components in long-span spatial structures, a profound understanding of their mechanical behavior is essential for structural design and safety evaluation. This paper presents a systematic review of the physical and mechanical properties of cables commonly used in building structures, offering reference data for key performance indicators. The mechanical responses and influencing factors pertaining to major types of cables-such as semi-parallel wire strand (SPWS), Galfan-coated steel strand (GSS), and full-locked coil wire rope (LCR)-are thoroughly examined. This review covers five critical aspects: fundamental cable characteristics, stress relaxation and creep, mechanical performance under high temperatures, corrosion-induced degradation, and post-fracture behavior after fatigue-induced wire breaks. It identifies key mechanical parameters, including elastic modulus, axial stiffness, bending stiffness, and the coefficient of thermal expansion. The degradation behavior of cables under high-temperature and corrosive conditions is examined, highlighting the superior corrosion resistance of LCR and GSS. Furthermore, the redistribution of stress and residual capacity after the rupturing of steel wires is elucidated. Based on recent studies, prospective directions are suggested to address current knowledge gaps and advance design strategies focused on durability and performance for forthcoming cable-supported structures.

Indexed as

architectural structural cablescorrosion-induced degradationhigh-temperature degradationmechanical characteristicspost-fracture mechanical behaviorstress relaxation and creep

Identifiers

PMID41470275
PMCPMC12734849

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.