Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41470178›Full record

ReviewMedicina (Kaunas, Lithuania)2025

Advances in Minimally Invasive Esophagectomy-An Overview of Recent Developments and a Novel Classification of Innovations in Treatment of Thoracic Esophageal Cancer.

Florin Achim, Koji Otsuka, Takeshi Yamashita, Yutaro Asagoe, Daisuke Kurita, Adrian Constantin, Silviu Constantinoiu, Ahmed Mohssen, Cristian Rosianu, Alexandru Rotariu and 3 more

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Florin AchimFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.ORCID 0000-0003-0095-494X
Koji OtsukaDivision of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-9625-785X
Takeshi YamashitaDivision of Gastroenterological and General Surgery, Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Showa Medical University, Tokyo 142-8666, Japan.
Yutaro AsagoeDepartment of Anesthesiology and Intensive Care Medicine, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Daisuke KuritaDepartment of Esophageal Surgery, National Cancer Center Hospital, Tokyo 104-0045, Japan.
Adrian ConstantinFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Silviu ConstantinoiuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Ahmed MohssenDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital, 011192 Bucharest, Romania.
Cristian RosianuDepartment of Gastroenterology, Sf. Maria Clinical Hospital, 011192 Bucharest, Romania.
Alexandru RotariuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Alex-Claudiu MoraruFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Anthony RasuceanuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.
Dragos PredescuFaculty of Medicine, Carol Davila University of Medicine and Pharmacy, 050474 Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) has become increasingly prominent in the surgical management of esophageal cancer (EC) over the past three decades. The adoption of minimally invasive techniques has significantly enhanced oncologic esophageal surgery by improving safety, achieving oncological radicality, preserving physiological function, and elevating the postoperative quality of life of the patients. The complexity of MIE lies in its technical nuances, which critically influence postoperative morbidity and, in severe cases, mortality, especially when complications evolve unchecked. These risks underscore the importance of meticulous surgical execution and perioperative management. The optimization of mediastinal lymphadenectomy and the reduction of procedure-related morbidity have consistently represented focal points of scientific inquiry and clinical refinement, posing a persistent challenge for esophageal surgeons. MIE is widely regarded as one of the most technically demanding procedures in oncologic surgery. Its advantages, however, are most evident in the postoperative phase, where reduced trauma and faster recovery are key benefits. Experienced surgical teams have introduced refinements to MIE protocols, aiming to optimize precision and reduce complication rates. This study aims to systematically synthesize the main technological advancements and innovations currently employed in the minimally invasive management of EC, presenting them in a structured classification designed to be both accessible and practical for specialists engaged in this domain.

Indexed as

Esophageal NeoplasmsEsophagectomyMinimally Invasive Surgical ProceduresHumansLymph Node ExcisionMcKeown modified triple approachminimally invasive esophagectomynovel classification of innovationsrobotic esophagectomythoracic esophageal cancertranscervical esophagectomy

Identifiers

PMID41470178
PMCPMC12734597

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.