ReviewJournal of neurochemistry2025
Writing the Engram: Epigenetic Mechanisms of Memory Allocation.
Review in Journal of neurochemistry, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- A computational framework for epigenetic plasticity in memory.Brain : a journal of neurology · 2026Review
- Inflammatory Memory of Adipose Tissue Macrophages: From CD68 Footprint to Cardiometabolic and Cancer Risk During Weight Cycling.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Memory allocation, the selective recruitment of neurons into ensembles that encode, store and retrieve experience, so-called engram cells, designates the initial step of every memory's formation. Historically thought to be governed primarily by intrinsic neuronal excitability, recent studies highlight a critical role for transcriptional and epigenetic heterogeneity in biasing neuronal engram inclusion. Here, we review mechanisms that influence this process, including CREB-mediated excitability, transcriptional priming and epigenetic modulation, and emphasise the surprisingly understudied link of how electrical properties and the epigenetic landscape converge to shape allocation. We then describe emerging methodologies for the manipulation and interrogation of these processes that will be crucial for disentangling not only local intracellular dynamics, but also their propagation across distributed brain networks. Doing so will prove instrumental to assess the possibility that several cognitive dysfunctions-that display aberrant excitability and epigenetic changes-may arise from memory misallocation, stressing the translational potential of this work. Lastly, beyond the role of the intrinsic neuronal properties, we discuss underexplored physiological influences, including metabolic state, hormonal signalling, sleep, gut-brain communication, and the potential contribution from other cell types such as astrocytes and interneurons that may shape engram selection. By integrating molecular, cellular and systems perspectives, with a sharpened emphasis on the importance of epigenetic mechanisms, we suggest that understanding allocation may benefit from a holistic viewpoint beyond the current excitability-focused and neuron-centric point of view.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.