ReviewJournal of neuroinflammation2025
CAR T cells as novel therapeutic strategy for multiple sclerosis and other neuroimmune disorders.
Review in Journal of neuroinflammation, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Real-World Effectiveness and Safety of Ofatumumab: Analysis of B Cell Depletion, Comorbidities and Ethnicity in a Spanish Cohort.Neurology and therapy · 2026Article
- Advanced biomaterials and digital twins for precision psychiatry: neuroimmune modulation and AI-guided therapeutics.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy for autoimmune diseases: from exploratory clinical trials to quantitative pharmacodynamic modeling development.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell therapy in neuroimmune diseases: mechanistic rationale, clinical experience, and translational challenges.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy is rapidly emerging as a transformative approach for treating multiple sclerosis (MS) and other neuroimmune disorders such as neuromyelitis optica spectrum disorder (NMOSD), myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody-associated disease (MOGAD), and myasthenia gravis (MG), alongside several other rare neuroimmunological conditions currently being evaluated in compassionate-use or early-phase studies. These conditions are driven in part by autoreactive B cells that sustain chronic inflammation and progressive tissue damage. While current immunomodulatory therapies have improved clinical outcomes, they often require lifelong administration and fail to effectively eliminate compartmentalized inflammation within the central nervous system. Recent advances in CD19- and BCMA-directed CAR T-cell therapy, initially developed for hematologic malignancies, demonstrate the potential to achieve targeted, durable B-cell depletion and immune reprogramming in autoimmune diseases. Preclinical models and early-phase clinical trials have shown promising efficacy, including reduced relapse rates, stabilization of disability progression, and decreased autoantibody levels, alongside a favorable safety profile with lower rates of high-grade cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) compared to oncologic applications. This review synthesizes the current evidence supporting the use of CAR T-cell therapy in neuroinflammatory diseases and explores its potential to redefine treatment paradigms by shifting from chronic immunosuppression to long-term immune tolerance, creating a favorable environment for repair mechanisms. Realizing the full therapeutic promise of CAR T-cells in autoimmune neurology will require sustained research in heterogeneous populations and across disease spectrums.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.