Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469920›Full record

SynthesisCritical care (London, England)2025

A systematic meta-review of interventions to prevent and manage delirium in the Intensive Care Unit: Part 1 - Pharmacological interventions.

Katherine L Jones, Burak Kundakci, Andrew Booth, Louise Falzon, Ben Gibbison, Maria Pufulete, OPTIC consortium

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Critical care (London, England), 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Katherine L JonesSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Burak KundakciSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Andrew BoothSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Louise FalzonSchool of Medicine and Population Health, Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research (SCHARR), University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.
Ben GibbisonBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK. ben.gibbison@bristol.ac.uk.
Maria PufuleteBristol Medical School, University of Bristol, Bristol, UK.
OPTIC consortium

Funding

National Institute for Health and Care Research NIHR204591
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundIntensive Care Unit (ICU) delirium is a multifactorial syndrome associated with prolonged hospitalization, increased morbidity and mortality, cognitive decline, and higher healthcare costs. Many randomised controlled trials of interventions to prevent or manage ICU delirium have been combined in systematic reviews. We aimed to collate and map the meta-analysed evidence for pharmacological interventions.

methodsEligible reviews included RCTs of any pharmacological intervention designed to prevent or manage critically ill adults with, or at risk of, ICU delirium. We searched 8 databases from inception to 26 September 2023. Two reviewers independently screened search results and confirmed eligibility of full texts. We then mapped the effects for pharmacological interventions (single or combined drugs and sedation strategies) along with the certainty of the evidence for outcomes in the Del-CorS core outcome set, ICU and hospital length of stay.

resultsOf 3,381 studies, we identified 56 relevant systematic reviews reporting our outcomes (17 included in mapping). Thirteen reviews with GRADE assessments were mapped for delirium outcomes (occurrence, duration or severity), six for ICU or hospital mortality, and 15 for ICU or hospital length of stay. The α2-adrenoceptor agonist drug class (primarily dexmedetomidine) had the largest evidence base and was probably favourable over placebo for preventing or reducing delirium occurrence (moderate to high-certainty evidence; 2 systematic reviews). The α2-adrenoceptor agonist drug class (primarily dexmedetomidine) was also probably favourable over placebo for reducing ICU and hospital length of stay (moderate-certainty evidence; one systematic review). The evidence was more variable for other pharmacological comparisons. For ICU mortality, there may have been little or no difference between dexmedetomidine and a non-dexmedetomidine comparator (low certainty), while the evidence was very uncertain on hospital mortality (one systematic review). No meta-analyses reported outcomes for cognition or emotional distress. Co-interventions, in particular non-pharmacological interventions, were often incompletely reported.

conclusionsMapped evidence suggests the α2-adrenoceptor agonist drug class (primarily dexmedetomidine), is most likely to be effective at managing delirium in the ICU. However, underlying conditions indicating or precluding intervention, and the impact of loss to follow-up, remain unclear. We found a lack of synthesised evidence for important core outcomes of cognition and emotional distress, and for deprescribing sedatives/analgesia as part of optimising sedation strategies.

Indexed as

DeliriumDexmedetomidineHumansIntensive Care UnitsDexmedetomidineAdult intensive and critical careDeliriumReview

Identifiers

PMID41469920
PMCPMC12751364

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.