ArticleInternational breastfeeding journal2025
Geographic inequalities in exclusive breastfeeding among infants under six months across 18 African countries.
Article in International breastfeeding journal, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundExclusive breastfeeding (EBF) is essential for infant survival, growth, and development. Despite known benefits, national averages often mask adherence to coverages and underlying geographic inequalities. While previous studies have examined national averages, less is known about how EBF rates vary within countries. This study assessed national and subnational disparities in EBF among infants under six months across 18 African countries using comparable 2019 estimates.
methodsThis retrospective cross-sectional ecological analysis used existing 2019 modelled EBF estimates from the Institute for Health Metrics and Evaluation (IHME), accessed through the World Health Organization (WHO) Health Equity Assessment Toolkit (HEAT, 2024 update). EBF estimates follow the WHO 24-hour recall definition for infants aged 0–6 months. Geographic inequalities were quantified using difference (D), ratio (R), population attributable risk (PAR), and population attributable fraction (PAF) using WHO HEAT’s built-in analytical tools. Spatial patterns were visualised using QGIS.
resultsNational prevalence of EBF ranged from 14.4% in Comoros to 65.9% in São Tomé and Príncipe. Only Ghana, Lesotho, São Tomé and Príncipe, and Zambia exceeded the 2019 global average of 43.5%. Subnational disparities were evident across nearly all countries, with the widest inequalities observed in Nigeria (D = 38.24, R = 9.13, PAF = 116.55%), Tanzania (D = 46.8, R = 2.69, PAF = 42.5%), and Cameroon (D = 24.21, R = 2.67, PAF = 45.48%). In contrast, São Tomé and Príncipe, Lesotho, Comoros, and Eswatini showed minimal regional variation (D ≤ 6, PAF < 7%). On average, one-third of national disparities could be reduced if all regions matched the prevalence of the best-performing areas.
conclusionEBF coverage across the 18 African countries remains highly uneven despite sustained global and national promotion efforts. While a small number of countries have achieved relatively high and uniform coverage, most continue to experience pronounced subnational gaps. Addressing these inequalities will require region-specific breastfeeding interventions, strengthened maternal support systems, and the systematic integration of equity considerations into national nutrition programmes. Enhanced subnational monitoring and multi-sectoral action will be essential for accelerating equitable progress toward the WHO global nutrition target of 70% EBF by 2030.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.