ArticleBMC medical education2025
Efficiency of remote videoconference-assisted ultrasound education: comparison with standard classroom training.
Article in BMC medical education, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic necessitated innovative approaches to medical education. This proposed a particular challenge for the teaching of practical skills, such as ultrasound (US) training.
methodsThis study compared the effectiveness of traditional classroom-based US training with that of remote training using teleguided US (Tele-US) among students in the Prehospital Critical Care (PHCC) program at the University of Stavanger, Norway. A total of 44 students were divided into two groups: one received standard classroom training, and the other received remote training because of pandemic restrictions. Both groups underwent a comprehensive one-day US course, including theoretical lectures and hands-on training sessions. Pre-course and post-course tests were used to assess theoretical knowledge, image and video interpretation skills, practical scanning techniques, and clinical decision-making.
resultsThere was no significant difference in educational outcomes between the tele-US and classroom groups across all areas of evaluation.
conclusionsTele-US appears to be a viable alternative to traditional classroom-based US education, especially in contexts requiring physical distancing or in geographically remote settings. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.