SynthesisBMC anesthesiology2025
Efficacy of dexmedetomidine in preventing emergence agitation in children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy: a meta-analysis and systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC anesthesiology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionEmergence agitation (EA) affects 10–80% of children after general anesthesia, with high rates following tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy. Although dexmedetomidine shows potential for preventing EA, its efficacy and safety in this specific pediatric population remain uncertain, with conflicting evidence from previous studies.
methodsComputerized searches of PubMed, The Cochrane Library, Web of Science, Embase, and OpenGrey were performed, and the search timeframe was from the time of construction to September 26, 2024, for all searches. Literature screening, data extraction, and evaluation of the risk of bias of the included studies were performed independently by two investigators. A meta-analysis was performed using STAT14 software, and heterogeneity was examined through subgroup analysis and meta-regression for route of administration, control medications, general anesthesia procedures, and EA assessment methods. The certainty of results was checked using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) method.
resultsOur study comprised 19 studies with 1697 children. Dexmedetomidine significantly reduced the incidence of EA in thirteen studies of 1222 children (RR = 0.36, 95% CI [0.30, 0.45], P = 0.036, I2 = 45.7%, GRADE = high). Subgroup analyses and meta-regression showed that different scales were the source of heterogeneity in EA incidence outcomes and that dexmedetomidine was more potent than other medications in reducing EA incidence (RR = 0.45, 95% CI [0.33, 0.61], P = 0.302). In eight studies, dexmedetomidine significantly decreased EA scores (SMD = − 0.77, 95% CI [− 1.08, − 0.47], P < 0.001, I2 = 77.6%, GRADE = moderate). Dexmedetomidine was superior to other medications in reducing EA scores (SMD = − 0.51, 95% CI [− 0.78, − 0.23], P = 0.052). Dexmedetomidine reduces pain scores (SMD = − 1.08, 95% CI [− 1.66, − 0.51], P < 0.001), postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV)(RR = 0.51, 95% CI [0.38, 0.69], P = 0.900), respiratory adverse events (desaturation: RR = 0.41, 95% CI [0.32, 0.53], P = 0.578; cough: RR = 0.27, 95% CI [0.14, 0.52], P = 0.56; laryngospasm or bronchospasm: RR = 0.25, 95% CI [0.09, 0.73], P = 0.773). No significant variations in post-anesthesia care unit and extubation time.
conclusionsPerioperative dexmedetomidine in children undergoing tonsillectomy and/or adenoidectomy reduces EA, pain, PONV, and respiratory adverse events without significant side effects. REGISTRATION NUMBER: CRD42024506421.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.