ReviewNature nanotechnology2026
Design and applications of synthetic biomolecular condensates.
Review in Nature nanotechnology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Carbon Dots as Electrostatically Driven Base-Selective Chemical Compilers for Programmable Nucleic Acid Condensation.JACS Au · 2026Article
- Multiscale rational construction strategy for polyphenol self-assembled delivery systems: from nanoscale to microscale.Materials today. Bio · 2026Review
- Organization and Triggered Release of Liposomes with DNA-Based Synthetic Condensates.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Programmable DNA Folding Modulates Phase Behavior and Dynamics of DNA/Peptide Condensates.ACS nano · 2026Article
- Metal-dependent and metal-free mechanisms of peptide condensate catalysts.Nature communications · 2026Article
- Glycine Composition and Ion Valency Tune Phase Behavior and Drug Encapsulation in Designer Peptide Condensates.ACS applied materials & interfaces · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Designed biomolecular condensates are emerging condensed-phase assemblies, initially conceived to mimic cellular biomolecular condensates for use in biology-inspired applications such as delivery and storage of biomolecules. In recent years, rational design approaches informed by supramolecular chemistry and biomolecular nanotechnology, including the use of peptide and DNA nanotechnology for building-block minimalization and site-specific interactions, have evolved rapidly, going beyond the molecular basis of cellular condensates in terms of both composition and functionality. Thus, synthetic condensates are designed from diverse molecular building blocks, including single- or multicomponent polypeptides, peptides, RNA, DNA or biopolymers; moreover, their applications are continuously evolving to encompass new nanotechnology-relevant functions including biosensing and bioadhesion, where condensates offer advantages such as responsiveness, programmability and molecular compartmentalization. In this Review, we show the main concepts behind the molecular design of synthetic condensates, from biological mimicry to purely synthetic approaches. We discuss the mechanisms that allow control and regulation of condensate properties and the remaining challenges in analysing these properties. Finally, we discuss the applications of synthetic condensates thus far, the potential in leveraging condensates as platforms for nanotechnological applications, and the remaining hurdles towards realizing this promise. We also provide an overview of the patent landscape, highlighting trends in commercial development across areas such as delivery systems, microreactors and sensing technologies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
41469832What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.