Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469819›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Identifying effective coping strategies against mobbing for Generations Y and Z using a Pythagorean fuzzy decision support mechanism.

Seçil Topaloğlu Eti, Serhat Yüksel, Serkan Eti, Hasan Dinçer

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Seçil Topaloğlu EtiSchool of Health, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey. secil.topaloglu@medipol.edu.tr.
Serhat YükselSchool of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Serkan EtiIMU Vocational School, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.
Hasan DinçerSchool of Business, Istanbul Medipol University, Istanbul, Turkey.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mobbing is a major workplace problem that harms employees' mental and physical well-being, reduces organizational productivity, and undermines social stability. In many regions and organizational contexts, understanding how different generations cope with mobbing has become increasingly important; however, the existing literature provides limited and fragmented evidence. This study offers a comprehensive and context-based analysis by identifying the most effective coping strategies for Generations Y and Z and examining the qualifications that influence their implementation. Data were obtained from five experts specializing in mobbing and organizational behavior. Experts' importance weights were calculated using a machine learning-based method that incorporates demographic characteristics, criteria weights were determined using the Entropy technique, and strategies were ranked through the CRADIS approach. To address uncertainty in expert evaluations, Pythagorean fuzzy numbers were integrated into the decision-making process. The proposed model contributes to the literature by (1) incorporating demographic-based expert weighting through machine learning, an approach rarely applied in previous studies; (2) developing separate analytical models for Generations Y and Z, thereby clarifying generational differences within a defined regional and organizational context; and (3) applying Pythagorean fuzzy numbers to enhance methodological robustness. Results indicate that for Generation Y, psychological resilience is the most critical qualification, and social activities such as meditation or sports constitute the most effective strategies. For Generation Z, academic education emerges as the key qualification, and leaving the job is identified as the most suitable strategy. The findings confirm distinct generational patterns in coping with mobbing and demonstrate the practical value of the proposed analytical model.

Indexed as

Adaptation, PsychologicalDecision Support TechniquesWorkplaceAdultCoping SkillsFemaleFuzzy LogicHumansMachine LearningMaleFuzzy decision-makingGenerations YGenerations ZMachine learningMobbingPhysical health

Identifiers

PMID41469819
PMCPMC12848093

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.