ArticleScientific reports2025
Climate-driven habitat shifts And niche overlap of overexploited trees Cordia africana Lam. and Terminalia brownii Fresen in Ethiopia.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cordia africana and Terminalia brownii, indigenous Ethiopian multipurpose trees of high ecological and socioeconomic value, are increasingly threatened by overexploitation and climate change. Understanding how climatic and anthropogenic factors shape their distribution is critical for sustainable management and conservation. This study identified key environmental drivers, predicted suitable habitats under current and future climates, and assessed shifts in distribution, geographic range, and niche overlap. Future climate projections were assessed under two scenarios: the medium-emission scenario (SSP2-4.5) and the high-emission scenario (SSP5-8.5), for two time horizons: the 2050s and 2070s. An ensemble modeling framework was applied using seven algorithms: boosted regression trees, random forest, generalized linear model, generalized additive model, maximum entropy, support vector machine, and multivariate adaptive regression splines. Each model was run with ten sub-sampled replicates. We evaluated model performance using the area under the curve (AUC) for C. africana (0.84) and T. brownii (0.82), and the true skill statistic (TSS), which was 0.60 for both species. Predicted suitable habitat for C. africana (20.1%) was concentrated in the western, central, and southwestern regions, while T. brownii (19.9%) was mainly distributed in the northern, eastern, and southeastern lowlands. Under future climate scenarios, suitable areas are projected to decline sharply, shrinking to 8.68% and 2.07% of Ethiopia’s land area, respectively, by the 2070s. Suitable habitats for both species are expected to contract, with potential refugia for C. africana shifting toward highland areas. Geographic and environmental overlap between the two species was minimal. Given their multipurpose use, increasing vulnerability, and limited niche and geographic overlap, our results show that the projected habitat contraction, the marked decline of T. brownii within its natural range, and the upslope shift of C. africana refugia require species-specific conservation actions. C. africana needs refugia protection and climate-adapted management, while T. brownii requires targeted measures to support its long-term viability. Conservation efforts should focus on safeguarding existing habitats, regulating harvesting, strengthening community-based forest management, and maintaining ecological connectivity. Both species will also require stricter control of human use under future climate change.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.