ArticleScientific reports2025
Multimodal deep learning ensemble framework for skin cancer detection.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Concept inconsistency in dermoscopic concept bottleneck models: a rough-set analysis of the Derm7pt dataset.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Multimodal Deep Learning with Attention-Based Fusion for Skin Cancer Diagnosis.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Interpretable multimodal fusion for skin lesion classification using dermoscopic images and patient metadata.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Multi-paradigm Vision Transformer ensemble with regional attention and MLP meta-fusion for explainable dermoscopic skin lesion classification.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Skin cancer is the abnormal growth of skin cells, most often developing on skin exposed to the sun. It is among the most fatal forms of cancer, making its early detection and therapy crucial. In addition to conventional techniques, deep learning methods are increasingly utilized for accurate identification and classification. This study proposes a convolutional neural network (CNN) model using transfer learning to detect and classify multiple types of skin cancer. This study focuses on evaluating the efficacy of transfer learning techniques in enhancing CNN performance for this critical task. A significant contribution of this study is the use of transfer learning to improve CNN performance in skin cancer detection and classification by leveraging pre-trained models, including ResNet50, Xception, MobileNet, EfficientNetB0, and DenseNet121. The integration of metadata demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy compared to using images alone, enhancing the performance of most models. Further enhancement was achieved through ensemble techniques, specifically an adaptive weighted ensemble method, which dynamically assigns weights to individual models based on their performance, resulting in superior overall accuracy. SMOTE was used as an oversampling technique to address class imbalance. The proposed fusion of pre-trained models (ResNet50, Xception, and EfficientNetB0) combined with metadata achieved 93.2% accuracy, 93% precision, 93% recall, 93% F1 score, and 97.3% AUC on the ISIC 2018 dataset. On the ISIC 2019 dataset, it achieved 91.1% accuracy, 92% precision, 93% recall, 92% F1 score, and 95.5% AUC, surpassing many state-of-the-art methods. Experiments on an external dataset, Derm7pt, resulted in 82.5% accuracy, with a precision of 86%, recall of 83%, F1 score of 84% and AUC of 89.15%, demonstrating the improved interpretability and generalization of the proposed model. The proposed ensemble model optimizes deep learning for healthcare applications, enhancing dermatological diagnosis and treatment strategies for skin cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.