Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469765›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Contours drive distinct orientation selectivity in the human visual system.

Seohee Han, Dirk B Walther

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Seohee HanDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Canada. seohee.han@mail.utoronto.ca.
Dirk B WaltherDepartment of Psychology, University of Toronto, 100 St. George Street, Toronto, Canada.

Funding

Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council (NSERC) Discovery Grant RGPIN-2020-04097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Orientation processing is central to visual perception, yet the contributions of different image features in natural scene orientation processing remain unresolved. Here, we present converging behavioral and neural evidence that human orientation judgments in real-world scenes depend more strongly on contours delineating object structure than on orientation energy from filter-based computations. In Study 1, participants judged the average orientation of image patches chosen to maximize the discrepancy between contour-based and filter-based orientation estimates. Judgments consistently matched contour-based estimates, indicating a perceptual bias for object boundaries. In Study 2, we modeled fMRI responses from the Natural Scenes Dataset using three image-computable models: Photo-Steerable Pyramid, Line drawing-Steerable Pyramid, and a Contour-based approach. Models prioritizing contour structure better explained the neural data and identified discrete patterns of orientation preferences. Collectively, these findings show that the human visual system encodes scene orientation by extracting contours, the fundamental components of shapes, over filter-based orientation energy. This challenges prevailing models of visual representation and underscores the importance of boundary information in natural vision.

Indexed as

Form PerceptionOrientationOrientation, SpatialVisual PerceptionAdultFemaleHumansMagnetic Resonance ImagingMalePattern Recognition, VisualPhotic StimulationYoung AdultContour processingfMRIOrientation perceptionScene perceptionVisual cortex

Identifiers

PMID41469765
PMCPMC12804738

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.