ArticleScientific reports2025
Mechanical behavior and microstructural investigation of loess sustainable stabilization using nanosilica and GGBS.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Mechanical and microstructural performance evaluation for cement-based mortar: calcined mud powder.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Stabilization of highly expansive clay using synergistic EAF slag and water treatment sludge: a mechanical performance study.Scientific reports · 2026Article
- Article
- Mechanical properties and freeze-thaw durability of expansive soil reinforced with polypropylene and lignin fibers.PloS one · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Loess, characterized by its high porosity, low strength, and sensitivity to weather conditions, presents significant challenges for sustainable infrastructure development. Conventional stabilization methods using lime and cement contribute substantially to greenhouse gas emissions and embodied energy. This study proposes a novel and eco-friendly approach for loess soil stabilization by incorporating nanosilica (NS) and ground granulated blast-furnace slag (GGBS), an industrial byproduct, to enhance mechanical performance while minimizing environmental impact. Special attention was given to sustainability aspects, including waste valorization, carbon emissions reduction, embodied energy, and practical feasibility. GGBS was combined with NS to improve the mechanical performance of the soil. Different NS contents (0.4%, 0.7%, 1%, and 1.3%) were evaluated, with 1% NS providing optimal pore filling and uniform dispersion. Subsequently, GGBS was added at varying concentrations (5%, 10%, 15%, and 20%) to the NS-treated loess. The samples cured for 7 and 28 days were subjected to freeze-thaw cycle testing. Experimental characterization included unconfined compressive strength (UCS), ultrasonic pulse velocity (UPV), collapse potential (CP), and microstructural analyses (SEM, XRD, FTIR, and BET). The optimal mix increased UCS by up to 24 times, with only a reduction of 9% after 10 freeze-thaw cycles. Microstructural analyses confirmed the formation of C-S-H and C-A-S-H gels, which led to soil densification. A quantitative sustainability assessment showed the reduction of carbon emissions by over 60% compared to traditional stabilization methods, along with decreased costs, emphasizing significant environmental and economic benefits. This method not only improves mechanical performance but also values industrial waste, thereby providing a scalable, cost-effective, and environmentally sustainable solution for loess stabilization.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.