ArticleInternational endodontic journal2026
Influence of Dual Heat Treatment on the Metallurgy and Mechanical Behaviour of Diamond-Like Carbon-Coated NiTi Rotary Systems: A Multimethod Investigation.
Article in International endodontic journal, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
aimTo investigate how the application of dual heat treatment during the manufacturing process influences the mechanical performance (flexibility, cyclic fatigue resistance, torsional strength, bending, buckling and cutting efficiency) of rotary nickel-titanium endodontic instruments. METHODOLOGY: Rainbow One (n = 58) and Rainbow Ultra (n = 58) instruments (size 25/0.06, 25 mm length) were evaluated. Geometric analysis was performed using optical 3D scanning and SEM to assess cutting edges, tip design and surface features. Metallurgical characterisation included EDS for elemental composition and DSC for phase transformation temperatures, with segments obtained from the tip, middle and coronal blade regions. Mechanical testing comprised cyclic fatigue, torsional strength (torque to failure, maximum angle of rotation), bending resistance, buckling strength and cutting efficiency. Standardised testing protocols were applied, including ASTM and ISO guidelines for mechanical assessments. Statistical analyses were conducted using Shapiro-Wilk and Levene tests to assess assumptions, followed by independent Student's t-tests, with significance set at 5%.
resultsBoth instruments shared equivalent geometries, with deviations below 100 μm, and similar tip designs and surface characteristics. EDS confirmed near-equiatomic NiTi composition for both systems. DSC revealed R-phase crystallographic structure at room temperature for both instruments; however, Rainbow Ultra exhibited higher phase transformation temperatures (Rs 35°C vs. 25°C; Rf 45°C vs. 31°C; As 30°C vs. 24°C; Af 50°C vs. 38°C) and a double austenitic transformation peak, compared with a single peak for Rainbow One. Mechanically, Rainbow Ultra demonstrated greater cyclic fatigue resistance (95.5° ± 7 vs. 79.1 ± 6 s), higher maximum rotation angle (485° ± 49° vs. 402° ± 50°), and improved cutting efficiency (p < 0.05). Rainbow One exhibited higher torque to failure (1.8° ± 0.2 vs. 1.4° ± 0.1 N·cm), greater bending load (369 ± 34 vs. 336 ± 14 gf), and higher buckling resistance (339 ± 32 vs. 273 ± 24 gf), indicating stiffer behaviour.
conclusionsThe application of dual heat treatment during manufacturing significantly influenced the mechanical performance of the tested rotary NiTi instruments. Rainbow Ultra, subjected to sequential heat treatments, exhibited higher flexibility, cyclic fatigue resistance and cutting efficiency, whereas Rainbow One demonstrated greater torsional strength and buckling resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.