ArticleJournal of ovarian research2025
Clinical outcomes of natural cycle IVF/M with the different sizes of dominant follicle at the time of hCG triggering.
Article in Journal of ovarian research, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeThere is infertility treatment named natural cycle in vitro fertilization (IVF) combined with in vitro maturation (IVM) of immature oocytes (natural IVF/M). The objective of this study is to investigate the clinical outcomes of hCG triggering at the different sizes of dominant follicle during the treatment.
methodsA total of 705 patients with 1,011 natural IVF/M treatment cycles were included in this study. Among these 64 patients had repeated cycles, while 641 patients had only a single cycle. The cycles were divided into 4 groups according to the size of dominant follicle on the day of hCG injection (Group1:≤11.9 mm; Group2:12.0–13.9 mm༛Group3:14.0–15.9 mm༛Group4:≥16.0 mm).Through multivariate logistic regression analysis, candidate factors of number of mature oocytes, available and good quality embryos as well as clinical pregnancy rates were explored.
resultsOocytes maturation, fertilization, cleavage, available and good quality embryo rates (p > 0.05) were no difference among 4 groups. The rates for implantation, clinical pregnancy, miscarriage, premature delivery, and live birth were similar among the groups.
conclusionThe presence and different sizes of the dominant follicle in the ovaries during natural cycle IVF/M does not affect clinical outcomes.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.