Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469659›Full record

ArticleHuman resources for health2025

Too many, too soon? Challenges in medical school expansion in the United Kingdom.

Tomas Ferreira, Alexander M Collins

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Human resources for health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Tomas Ferreira *Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK. YL19784@bristol.ac.uk.
Alexander M Collins *Bristol Medical School, University of Bristol, 5 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1UD, UK.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The persistent shortfall in medical staffing in the UK has drawn renewed focus since the government first published its NHS Long Term Workforce Plan, in which it pledged to double the capacity of UK medical schools in the context of significant bottlenecks in doctors' pathways to career progression. In this article, we challenge the viability of medical school expansion as a tool to combat the persistent workforce crisis in the NHS. Our critique contributes to the ongoing workforce planning debate, and highlights issues with clinical capacity, sustainability, and the preservation of educational standards. With an updated Long Term Workforce Plan forthcoming, we urge policymakers to implement an immediate moratorium on medical school expansion in the UK until these factors - and a viable future for the medical profession - can be guaranteed.

Indexed as

Education, MedicalHealth WorkforcePhysiciansSchools, MedicalState MedicineHumansUnited KingdomHealth policyMedical careersMedical educationWorkforce planning

Identifiers

PMID41469659
PMCPMC12754921

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.