SynthesisBMC medical ethics2025
Outcomes of team based learning in teaching medical ethics: a systematic review.
Synthesis in BMC medical ethics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Moral intensity and ethical sensitivity in pre-service therapeutic sciences clinicians: a vignette-level analysis of ethical principle recognition and ethical sensitivity skills.BMC medical ethics · 2026Article
- Flipped classroom integrated with team-based learning enhances surgical skills in ophthalmology residency training: a randomized controlled trial.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThe integration of Team Based Learning (TBL) into medical ethics education has gained attention as a means of promoting active engagement, ethical reasoning, and professional development. This systematic review evaluates the characteristics, outcomes, challenges and quality of studies on TBL in teaching medical ethics across healthcare education contexts.
methodsFollowing PRISMA guideline, a systematic search was conducted in PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Google Scholar from 2000 to March 31, 2025. Only peer-reviewed empirical studies published in English and focusing on TBL in ethics education were included. Data were extracted on study characteristics, TBL interventions, measurement tools and outcomes. The identified outcomes were then analyzed and categorized using the Kirkpatrick framework to evaluate their hierarchical levels. Methodological quality was assessed using the MERSQI instrument. Due to heterogeneity, a narrative synthesis was conducted.
resultsThe 15 studies, involving 2,134 participants, demonstrated TBL's effectiveness in ethics education across diverse global settings. Studies originated from the United States (6), Turkey (2), Korea (2), a joint Bahrain/Ireland study (1), and single studies from the United Arab Emirates, Malaysia, Oman, and Nepal. Asia contributed 9 studies, North America 6, and Europe 1. Most studies were published between 2019 and 2025. When evaluated through the Kirkpatrick model, TBL demonstrated positive outcomes across multiple levels. Learner Reaction (Level 1) was highly favorable, with consistent reports of high satisfaction and engagement. In terms of Learning (Level 2), the intervention enhanced knowledge retention, ethical reasoning, and moral sensitivity. Furthermore, there was evidence of Behavioral change (Level 3), as students transferred learning to practice by applying ethical principles more effectively, demonstrating deeper cultural awareness, and engaging in more robust team-based decision-making. The fostering of a stronger professional identity suggests a foundational shift aligned with long-term Results (Level 4). Challenges included low pre-reading compliance, resource intensity, and ambiguous assessments. MERSQI scores ranged from 7.5 to 13.0, with an average of 10.2, indicating moderate methodological quality overall.
conclusionsTBL is an effective pedagogical approach for medical ethics education, fostering critical thinking, ethical behavior, and engagement in diverse global settings. Its interactive, learner-centered design promotes cultural and moral awareness and team-based decision-making, with high student satisfaction. Despite implementation challenges, the evidence supports its broader adoption in ethics teaching. Future research should prioritize rigorous study designs, validated assessment tools, and long-term outcome evaluation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.