Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469636›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Promoting healthy lifestyles in childhood: can a social media campaign targeting parents and carers be a valuable tool?

Chiara Cattaneo, Paola Pani, Vittorio Palermo, Eleonora Maurel, Alessandra Knowles, Claudia Carletti, BIG† group

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Chiara Cattaneo *National Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy Viale Regina Elena 299, Roma, 00161, Italy.
Paola Pani *Clinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit. Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via Dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste, 34137, Italy.
Vittorio PalermoNational Centre for Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, National Institute of Health, Rome, Italy Viale Regina Elena 299, Roma, 00161, Italy.
Eleonora MaurelClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit. Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via Dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste, 34137, Italy. eleonora.maurel@burlo.trieste.it.
Alessandra KnowlesClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit. Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via Dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste, 34137, Italy.
Claudia CarlettiClinical Epidemiology and Public Health Research Unit. Institute for Maternal and Child Health - IRCCS "Burlo Garofolo", Via Dell'Istria 65/1, Trieste, 34137, Italy.
BIG† group

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSocial media can have a profound impact on population health and should be considered an important determinant of health. No published studies have assessed the potential of Social Media Campaigns (SMCs) as public health tools to address lifestyle behaviours in school-aged children. The aims of this study were to assess the performance of a health promotion SMC targeting parents and carers, compare its cost and reach with a print-based health communication campaign, and document audience responses to the SMC topics.

methodsDuring a 9-month long SMC promoting healthy lifestyles in primary school children, communication materials on the importance of healthy eating habits, physical activity, and of reducing sedentary lifestyles, were posted on Facebook and Instagram. Online social media Key Performance Indicators were used to analyse the SMC within the context of health promotion; costs were defined as expenditures for sponsorship and management of the SMC and for printing and distributing materials for the print-based health communication campaign; a qualitative analysis was carried out to examinate the comments posted by users.

resultsThe SMC reached 1,366,287 accounts and generated 1,791,458 impressions, mostly through sponsored posts. Although the overall budget for the SMC was 2.2 times higher than the one spent for the print-based health communication campaign, the SMC reached almost 27 times more people. Qualitative analysis showed 78% of comments moderately-strongly agreed with the Campaign’s recommendations. Most comments recognized the importance of proper nutrition and an active lifestyle in children, although several users expressed concerns regarding the feasibility of the recommendations.

conclusionsThe findings of this study suggest that social media can be used to convey information on topics of public health concern, thanks to its potential to reach large portions of the population, at a fraction of the cost of print-based health communication campaigns. Our results support the hypothesis that a SMC can be a useful tool to disseminate information regarding healthy lifestyles in school-aged children, with the aim of improving knowledge on nutrition and physical activity among parents and carers. More research is needed to assess the effectiveness of SMCs in changing children's lifestyles and parents' attitudes.

Indexed as

CaregiversHealth PromotionHealthy LifestyleParentsSocial MediaChildExerciseFemaleHumansMaleCampaignHealth promotionHealthy eating habitsPhysical activityPublic health toolSchool-aged childrenSedentary lifestylesSocial media

Identifiers

PMID41469636
PMCPMC12859976

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.