Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469627›Full record

SynthesisBMC public health2025

The effectiveness of interventions in reducing economic inactivity for people with long term health conditions and disabilities in the United Kingdom: a systematic review.

Catherine Haighton, Jill Wales, Ross Wilkie, Joanne Gray, Paul Crawshaw

Abstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Health inequalities and health-related economic inactivity: WhyPublic health in practice (Oxford, England) · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Catherine HaightonSchool of Communities and Education, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK. katie.haighton@northumbria.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8061-0428
Jill WalesSchool of Social Sciences, Teesside University, Humanities & Law, Clarendon Building, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7428-2424
Ross WilkiePrimary Care Centre Versus Arthritis, School of Medicine, Keele University, Staffordshire, ST5 5BG, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4825-714X
Joanne GraySchool of Healthcare and Nursing Sciences, Northumbria University, Coach Lane Campus, Newcastle upon Tyne, NE7 7XA, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6157-230X
Paul CrawshawSchool of Social Sciences, Teesside University, Humanities & Law, Clarendon Building, Middlesbrough, TS1 3BX, UK.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9299-4895

Funding

NIHR Work & Health Programme NIHR206806
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundEconomic inactivity, the proportion of people aged between 16 and 64 years who are not in the labour force, has increased significantly since 2020. Long-term sickness is the most common reason for economic inactivity. In the North of England, economic activity is lower, and levels of poor health in the working age population are higher, than national averages. The international literature reports many interventions designed to reduce economic inactivity including those designed to ameliorate the impact of health conditions on work participation, however, there is a need for high-quality evidence of what works for people with health conditions living in the United Kingdom (UK), and in particular for those living in areas of high deprivation such as the North of England.

methodsWe conducted a systematic review preregistered with the open science framework. We searched AMED, ASSIA, Business Source Premier, CINAHL, Cochrane Library, MEDLINE, ProQuest Dissertations & Theses Global, PsycARTICLES, Science Direct, and Scopus to November 2023. Eligibility criteria for selecting studies consisted of experimental and observational studies published or in grey literature that examined the efficacy or effectiveness of interventions in reducing economic inactivity in people with health conditions living in the UK. Two reviewers independently screened abstracts and full texts followed by data extraction and synthesis using the Narrative Synthesis Framework.

resultsTwenty-seven reports detailing sixteen unique studies and eight different interventions met the eligibility criteria and were included in the review. There was conflicting evidence for the effectiveness of sanctions on economic inactivity and the most robust evidence for classic individual placement and support although more evidence is needed for time-limited individual placement and support. Included studies highlighted the importance of providing specialist employment advice via skilled and experienced advisors but conflicting evidence on combining employment advice with specific psychological therapies.

conclusionsOverall, we found limited robust evidence of what works in reducing health related economic inactivity, particularly for populations experiencing elevated levels of socio-economic deprivation. OPEN SCIENCE FRAMEWORK PREREGISTRATION: https://osf.io/aucz9 .

Indexed as

Persons with DisabilitiesAdolescentAdultChronic DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedUnited KingdomChronic diseaseDisabled personsEconomic inactivitySystematic review

Identifiers

PMID41469627
PMCPMC12754864

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.