Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469621›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Strengthening community engagement in pandemic preparedness: insights from COVID-19 response in Sidama Region, Ethiopia.

Aschalew Abayneh, Sileshi Demelash Sasie, Selamawit Mengesha, Mark Spigt

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Aschalew AbaynehEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia. aschalewaw07@gmail.com.
Sileshi Demelash SasieEthiopian Public Health Institute, Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
Selamawit MengeshaDepartment of Family Medicine, CAPHRI School for Public Health and Primary Care, Maastricht University, Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Mark SpigtHawassa University, Hawassa, Ethiopia.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe COVID-19 pandemic highlighted the critical importance of community engagement in managing disease outbreaks. In Ethiopia, efforts to control the pandemic were hampered by a limited understanding of the disease, especially in rural areas. While early studies provided some insights, there remains a significant gap in comprehensive data on community involvement throughout all phases of outbreak management. This study aimed to assess knowledge, attitudes, practices, and community participation in pandemic preparedness and response, emphasizing that informed and engaged communities are key to early detection, effective intervention, and overall outbreak control. Learning from the COVID-19 experience, it is essential to understand how communities can be better equipped to respond to future public health threats.

methodsA cross-sectional study was carried out between October and December 2022 across eight rural districts in the Sidama region of Ethiopia. Using multistage sampling, a total of 593 community members were selected and interviewed with a semi-structured questionnaire. Data were entered into EpiData version 4.6 and analyzed in SPSS version 25 using descriptive statistics, bivariate analysis, and multivariable logistic regression to identify factors associated with knowledge, attitudes, practices (KAP), and community participation.

resultsThe majority of participants, 76% (95% CI: 72.5-79.3), demonstrated sufficient knowledge about COVID-19 transmission and prevention, yet only 58% (95% CI: 54.0-61.9) showed positive attitudes, and 28% (95% CI: 24.5-31.7) reported practicing good preventive behaviors. Participation in emergency response activities, such as mask-wearing, handwashing, and symptom identification, was relatively low at 35% (95% CI: 31.2-39.0). Education level, marital status, and risk perception were significant predictors of KAP and participation levels. Individuals with primary (AOR = 5.06, 95% CI: 2.81-9.11) or secondary education (AOR = 4.84, 95% CI: 2.64-8.87) had greater odds of possessing adequate knowledge compared to those without education. Unmarried participants were less likely to exhibit positive attitudes (AOR = 0.58, 95% CI: 0.35-0.96), and perceiving low personal risk was associated with lower preventive practices (AOR = 0.32, 95% CI: 0.21-0.48) and participation in response activities (AOR = 0.19, 95% CI: 0.12-0.30).

conclusionWhile knowledge of COVID-19 was relatively high, attitudes were only moderate and preventive practices remained low. The finding that only 35% of the population actively participated in COVID-19 response efforts highlights a critical gap in community engagement during health crises. From an emergency management perspective, this calls for more effective strategies to translate awareness into proactive involvement. The Ministry of Health and WHO must focus on trust-building, communication, and empowering local leaders to mobilize communities. Tailored, community-driven models and culturally appropriate messaging are essential to ensure grassroots resilience and preparedness in future pandemics.

Indexed as

Community ParticipationCOVID-19Health Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticePandemicsAdolescentAdultCross-Sectional StudiesEthiopiaFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPandemic PreparednessRural PopulationSARS-CoV-2Surveys and QuestionnairesCommunity engagementCOVID-19EthiopiaOutbreak preparednessPublic health emergency responseRural areas

Identifiers

PMID41469621
PMCPMC12860005

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.