ArticleBMC public health2025
A mixed-methods study of food environment and consumer perception in Catalonia.
Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe rise of ultra-processed foods has led to unhealthy food environments in Southern Europe, including Catalonia, where Mediterranean diets are being replaced by Western eating habits. This shift is contributing to obesity and diet-related diseases. While food policies often focus on consumer choices, they overlook broader environmental factors. The aim of this study was to investigate the food environment and consumer perceptions and how these influence dietary choices.
methodsThis study used a mixed-methods design to examine food environment perceptions among adults aged 40 and over in Catalonia, Spain. Quantitative data were collected using the modified NEMS-P-MED survey, which assessed perceptions of the food environment and sustainability. Qualitative data were gathered through Photovoice and focus groups, allowing participants to share their experiences. Statistical analyses were performed using descriptive methods, and qualitative data were analysed using content analysis.
resultsParticipants generally perceived their environment as supportive of healthy eating, with easy access to fresh fruits and vegetables. While food shopping focused on quality and variety, sustainability and cost were also considered. Convenience often outweighed health considerations, especially when eating out. Healthy food availability in stores and restaurants was positively viewed, but convenience frequently influenced decisions. Despite the availability of healthy foods, a gap remains between actual eating habits and dietary guidelines, driven by cost and taste preferences.
conclusionFood choices are shaped by factors such as health, affordability, culture, and sustainability. Interventions should focus on improving the affordability and accessibility of healthy foods, but structural changes and multi-sector collaboration are essential to promote sustainable diets.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.