Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469603›Full record

ArticleBMC public health2025

Temporal trends and correlates of overall and domain-specific sitting time in Germany between 2014 and 2023.

Birgit Wallmann-Sperlich, Claas Lendt, Bianca Biallas, Hansjörg Baurecht, Carmen Jochem, Jens Bucksch, Michael Leitzmann, Ingo Froboese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC public health, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Birgit Wallmann-SperlichIntegrative and Experimental Exercise Science and Training, Institute for Sports Science, Faculty of Human Science, Julius-Maximilians University of Würzburg, Judenbühlweg 11, Würzburg, D-97082, Germany. birgit.sperlich@uni-wuerzburg.de.
Claas LendtDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, D-93053, Germany.
Bianca BiallasInstitute of Movement Therapy and Movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, Cologne, 50933, Germany.
Hansjörg BaurechtDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, D-93053, Germany.
Carmen JochemDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, D-93053, Germany.
Jens BuckschDepartment of Prevention and Health Promotion, Faculty of Natural and Sociological Sciences, Heidelberg University of Education, Postfach 10 42 40, Heidelberg, D-69032, Germany.
Michael LeitzmannDepartment of Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine, University of Regensburg, Franz-Josef-Strauss-Allee 11, Regensburg, D-93053, Germany.
Ingo FroboeseInstitute of Movement Therapy and Movement-oriented Prevention and Rehabilitation, German Sport University Cologne, Am Sportpark Müngersdorf 6, Cologne, 50933, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSedentary behavior, particularly prolonged sitting, is a significant global public health issue. However, comprehensive population-level temporal trends on sitting time are sparse, hampering effective monitoring and policy development. This study aims to examine temporal trends and correlates of overall and domain-specific sitting time among the adult population in Germany from 2014 to 2023.

methodsData were obtained from five cross-sectional, population-representative telephone surveys conducted in Germany in 2014, 2016, 2018, 2021, and 2023, comprising a total of N = 14,417 adults aged 18 years and older. Participants completed the domain-specific Marshall Sitting Questionnaire, reporting sitting time across five domains: transport, work, television viewing, leisure-time electronic media use, and other leisure activities. Descriptive statistics and linear regression analyses were performed to examine time trends and sociodemographic and lifestyle correlates, with all results presented as mean estimates and 95% confidence intervals.

resultsBetween 2014 and 2023, average overall weekday sitting time increased by 76 minutes per weekday, rising from 457 to 533 minutes. The most pronounced relative increases were observed in work-related (42%) and leisure-time electronic media use (31%). The prevalence of high sitting time (>8 hours/weekday) rose from 42% in 2014 to 55% in 2023. Regression analyses indicated that men (31.8 minutes/weekday, 95% CI: 22.5, 41.1), younger adults (-2.3, 95% CI: -2.5, -2.0), individuals with higher education (57.1, 95% CI: 43.8, 70.4) and income levels (41.7, 95% CI: 25.9, 57.5), and urban residents (21.5, 95% CI: 8.7, 34.2) had significantly longer overall sitting times compared to women, older adults, individuals with lower education and income, and those living in rural areas, respectively.

conclusionsTemporal trends from Germany indicate a substantial increase in both overall and domain-specific sitting time between 2014 and 2023, predominantly driven by work-related and screen-based leisure activities. These findings underscore the urgent need for public health strategies aimed at reducing prolonged sitting, particularly in work and leisure contexts. Targeted population-specific and context-sensitive interventions are increasingly needed to mitigate the rise in overall and domain-specific sitting time.

Indexed as

Sedentary BehaviorSitting PositionAdolescentAdultAgedCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleGermanyHumansLeisure ActivitiesMaleMiddle AgedSurveys and QuestionnairesTime FactorsYoung AdultCorrelates of sedentary behaviorCross-sectional surveyDomain-specific sittingGermanyPhysical activityPopulation-based studyPopulation surveillanceSedentary behaviorSitting timeTemporal trends

Identifiers

PMID41469603
PMCPMC12930690

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.