SynthesisBMC infectious diseases2025
The impact of tuberculosis and its treatment on the lung and gut microbiota: a global systematic review, meta-analysis, and amplicon-based metagenomic meta-analysis.
Synthesis in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the gut microbiome to combat tuberculosis: a technological and clinical review.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2026Review
- From microbiome to outcome: the cascading effects of combining acid suppressants with anti-tuberculosis therapy.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) remains the leading cause of bacterial disease-related mortality worldwide. While Koch’s single-agent model has long guided TB diagnostics and treatment, metagenomic studies reveal a resident lung microbiome disrupted by TB and its orally administered therapy, with downstream effects on the gut microbiome. Understanding these disruptions may uncover diagnostic and prognostic indicators. We systematically reviewed 38 studies involving 3394 individuals with TB and healthy controls across four continents to assess the impact of TB and its treatment on lung and gut microbiome diversity, structure, and composition. A meta-analysis of 29 studies and a patient-level amplicon metagenomic meta-analysis (AMMA) of 1617 individuals (1.3 billion reads) were conducted following PRISMA guidelines [PROSPERO: CRD42022329763].
resultsNo global consensus exists on TB's impact on lung microbial diversity. Pooled estimates suggest a reduction of ~0.14 in lung diversity and 0.41 in gut diversity. Patient-level analyses showed no overall significant difference in lung diversity (Shannon index), though reductions were evident in China but not South Africa. Conversely, gut diversity tended to be higher in TB cases. Disease status explained only 0.8–9% of variation in lung microbiota and 1.8–9% in gut communities. Composition-wise, TB was associated with depletion of anaerobic core lung genera (e.g. Prevotella, Neisseria, Veillonella, Haemophilus, Fusobacterium, Pseudomonas, Streptococcus, Porphyromonas, Treponema) and gut genera (e.g. Prevotella, Ruminococcus, Faecalibacterium, Clostridium, Roseburia, Rothia, Eubacterium, Escherichia). Treatment further reduced diversity at both sites, with additional loss of core taxa.
conclusionTB is generally linked to reduced lung microbial diversity but increased gut diversity, with effects varying by country, suggesting context-specific rather than universal microbial signatures. Treatment consistently decreases diversity in both lung and gut. Although findings here primarily reflect the upper respiratory tract, they highlight potentially exploitable microbial dynamics. Future studies should integrate additional diversity metrics and broader metadata to refine these insights for advancing their clinical utility. CLINICAL TRIAL: Not applicable.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.