Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469570›Full record

ArticleBMC infectious diseases2025

Epidemiological characteristics and spatial clustering analysis of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers in China, 2014-2022.

Huihui Xiao, Jin Zhao, Jinsong Qiu, Shuilian Chen, Yinzhu Zhou

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in BMC infectious diseases, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Huihui XiaoDepartment of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China.
Jin ZhaoDepartment of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China.
Jinsong QiuDepartment of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China.
Shuilian ChenDepartment of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China. 540432722@qq.com.
Yinzhu ZhouDepartment of Infectious Disease Prevention and Control, Changsha Center for Disease Control and Prevention, Changsha, Hunan, 410004, China. 375234093@qq.com.

Funding

Health Commission of Hunan Province, China (20256279)Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province, China (2025JJ80516)
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe prevention and control of infectious diseases have become a critical issue in public health, especially after COVID-19. Typhoid and paratyphoid fevers continue to pose a threat, with outbreaks still occurring in many parts of the world, including certain regions of China. The aim of this study was to analyze the incidence trends and epidemiological characteristics of typhoid and paratyphoid fevers in China from 2014 to 2022, to delineate the evolving epidemiological characteristics and spatiotemporal patterns, thereby informing evidence-based prevention and control strategies.

methodsData on typhoid and paratyphoid cases were obtained from the Public Health Science Data Center of the Chinese Center for Disease Control and Prevention and the China Health Statistics Yearbook and demographic data from the National Bureau of Statistics. Joinpoint 5.3.0 and R 4.4.1 software were applied for temporal trend and seasonal analysis, while spatial autocorrelation and clustering analysis were performed using ArcGIS 10.2 software.

resultsFrom 2014 to 2022, a total of 67,252 cases of typhoid were reported nationwide. The incidence rate decreased from 0.76/100,000 in 2014 to 0.33/100,000 in 2022, with Joinpoint regression analysis showing an annual percentage change (APC) of -9.57% (P < 0.001). The proportion of cases in the 0-4 and ≥ 60 age groups showed an increasing trend, rising from 12.12% and 15.36% in 2014 to 23.17% and 19.10% in 2022, respectively. The composition ratio of scattered children increased from 13.04% in 2014 to 20.55% in 2022. The highest incidence rate was observed in the 0-4 age group, ranging from 1.42/100,000 to 1.87/100,000. High-incidence provinces for typhoid included Yunnan, Guangxi, Guizhou, and Guangdong Province. During the same period, 20,044 paratyphoid cases were reported nationwide, with the incidence rate decreasing from 0.24/100,000 in 2014 to 0.09/100,000 in 2022. Joinpoint regression analysis showed an APC of -9.54% (P = 0.001). The proportion of cases in the 0-4 and ≥ 60 age groups increased from 13.00% and 11.09% in 2014 to 40.08% and 23.31% in 2022, respectively. The composition ratio of scattered children increased from 13.12% in 2014 to 38.26% in 2022. The highest incidence rate was observed in the 0-4 age group, ranging from 0.55/100,000 to 0.91/100,000, showing a fluctuating upward trend. High-incidence provinces for paratyphoid included Yunnan, Guangxi, Guizhou, Hainan and Guangdong Province.

conclusionTyphoid and paratyphoid fever in China continue to exhibit low-level endemicity, with incidence rates declining in recent years. Special attention should be paid to the rising incidence in the 0-4 age group and the increasing proportion of cases among individuals aged ≥ 60 years. High-incidence provinces are primarily concentrated in Yunnan, Guangxi, Guizhou, Guangdong, and Hainan Province. CLINICAL TRIAL NUMBER: Not applicable.

Indexed as

Paratyphoid FeverTyphoid FeverAdolescentAdultAgedChildChild, PreschoolChinaCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansIncidenceInfantMaleMiddle AgedSeasonsEpidemiological characteristicsJoinpoint regressionParatyphoidSpatial clustering analysisTyphoid

Identifiers

PMID41469570
PMCPMC12860056

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.