ArticleBMC cardiovascular disorders2025
Nationwide patterns of cardiac-related mortality in amyloidosis cases: an epidemiologic study.
Article in BMC cardiovascular disorders, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Impact of cardiac amyloidosis on survival in aortic stenosis patients undergoing TAVR: a systematic review and reconstructed time-to-event meta-analysis.The Egyptian heart journal : (EHJ) : official bulletin of the Egyptian Society of Cardiology · 2026Article
- Understanding Mortality Data: A Step-by-Step Guide to CDC WONDER, Joinpoint Analysis, and Forecasting Models.Journal of epidemiology and global health · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
15 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionCardiac amyloidosis is frequently overlooked, leading to delayed diagnosis and underestimation of its true impact on cardiac mortality.
methodsUsing CDC WONDER (1999-2020), we identified U.S. decedents aged ≥ 25 years with amyloidosis (ICD-10 E85) as the underlying cause of death and at least one cardiac-related condition as a contributing cause. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 population were calculated, and trends were analyzed using Joinpoint regression and autoregressive integrated moving average (ARIMA) forecasting through 2040.
resultsAmong 16,673 deaths, the AAMR rose from 0.261 in 1999 to 0.608 in 2020, with inflection points in 2012 and 2017 and an overall annual increase of 3.96%. Mortality was higher in men (0.537 vs. 0.210) and Black individuals (0.83 vs. 0.32), with a sharp post-2017 rise, especially among Black decedents. Geographic disparities were also observed, with the highest rates in the Northeast and urban areas. Most deaths occurred in hospitals (43.2%) or at home (31.4%), and mortality rates peaked in those aged 85 and older. Forecasting models project continued increases in AAMR through 2040, reaching approximately 2.0 overall, with especially elevated rates among Black (≈ 5.9) and male (≈ 3.8) decedents.
conclusionCardiac mortality in amyloidosis has risen sharply since 2017, likely driven by improved ATTR-CM detection through non-biopsy imaging and guideline adoption. Disparities by sex, race, and geography persist, reflecting uneven diagnostic capacity concentrated in urban and Northeastern centers. Forecasts project continued increases, particularly among Black and male individuals, underscoring the need for more equitable access to diagnosis and treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.