ArticleBMC bioinformatics2025
DANSE: a pipeline for dynamic modelling of time-series multi-omics data.
Article in BMC bioinformatics, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundUnderstanding time-dependent intracellular processes, such as cell differentiation, is key to developing new therapies for a wide range of diseases. Models that connect transcription factor activity to dynamic expression patterns are rare, despite the increased availability of time-series data.
resultsTo identify key regulators of time-dependent biological processes, we present the pipeline DANSE: Dynamics inference Algorithm on Networks Specified by Enhancers. Starting from multi-omics data, our pipeline constructs a data-driven mechanistic transcription factor (TF) network and subsequently defines a dynamic model based on this TF network. The combination of a TF network and a mechanistic model allows for the identification of a small set of key transcription factors predicted to drive the modelled biological process. We showcase the result of our pipeline by applying DANSE to two different datasets that describe iPSC differentiation.
conclusionsModels constructed using DANSE suggest testable hypotheses for the perturbation of gene expression, for example, knockdown or overexpression, that influence cell fate. In this way, DANSE is a powerful tool for generating novel hypotheses in a data-driven manner that take into account the dynamic nature of multi-omics time series data.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.