Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469515›Full record

ArticleNPJ digital medicine2025

A deep learning based automated maxillary sinus segmentation and bone grafts analysis in CBCT images.

Fan Yang, Xing Wu, Yukang Zhang, Xinrui Lang, Ying Yang, Leizi Ma, Yude Ding, Linhong Wang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in NPJ digital medicine, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Fan Yang *Center for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xing Wu *Center for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yukang ZhangCenter for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Xinrui LangCenter for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Ying YangCenter for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Leizi MaCenter for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China.
Yude DingCenter for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. dingyude@hmc.edu.cn.
Linhong WangCenter for Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery, Department of Stomatology, Zhejiang Provincial People's Hospital, Affiliated People's Hospital, Hangzhou Medical College, Hangzhou, Zhejiang, China. wanglinhong@hmc.edu.cn.

Funding

Fund Committee of the Pioneer and Leading Goose Technology Project of Zhejiang Province 2024C03094
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Precise evaluation of bone gain after maxillary sinus augmentation is critical for optimizing implant therapy yet manual measurements remain time consuming. This study validated a fully automated deep learning system named SA-ai to quantify bone augmentation. A paired CBCT dataset from 85 patients was used to train and test the system which integrates a 2D U-Net for sinus contour and a 3D V-Net for maxilla segmentation. The system achieved a Dice coefficient of 93.2% and registration RMSE of 1.046 mm. Clinical validation against manual measurements showed excellent agreement for bone volume (ICC = 0.993) and other parameters. Bias analysis confirmed measurement stability while workflow efficiency improved over 20-fold compared to manual methods. This registration subtraction paradigm delivers an automated and objective solution for longitudinal monitoring of bone graft volume including one-stage implant cases potentially standardizing clinical evaluation of post augmentation bone dynamics.

Identifiers

PMID41469515
PMCPMC12852712

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.