ArticleScientific reports2025
A deep-learning system for the assessment of coronary heart disease risk via scleral photographs.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Cardiovascular disease is a major cause of death worldwide, especially the coronary heart disease (CHD). Scleral blood vessels provide information on the risk of CHD. Here, we report the development and validation of deep learning system that leverages scleral photographs for assessment of CHD risk, using diverse multi-age datasets that comprise more than 5000 images. Risk assessment of CHD measured by the system and by specialist doctors showed high agreement, with overall accuracy of 0.891 and AUC of 0.942. We further demonstrated that the trained deep learning system predominantly relied on vascular abnormalities as interpretable features for prediction, and in a subset of cases, it also captured pigmentation spots. These findings suggest that the model learns physiologically relevant cues linking scleral changes to CHD, thereby enhancing its clinical interpretability. Our findings motivate the development of clinically application explainable deep learning system for the assessment of CHD risk on the basis of the features of vessels and spots in scleral photographs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.