Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469426›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2025

Stress and stiffness analysis of the multiple corrugated diaphragm under angular load based on plate and shell theory.

Angang Cao, Huiting Jin, Wei Li, Shiquan Jiang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Angang CaoSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, 450064, China. caoangang88@163.com.
Huiting JinSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, 450064, China.
Wei LiSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, 450064, China.
Shiquan JiangSchool of Mechanical Engineering, Zhengzhou University of Science and Technology, Zhengzhou, 450064, China.

Funding

Natural Science Foundation of Henan No.252300420072the education department of Henan Province No. 24A460023 and No. 26A460029the Henan Province Science and Technology Research Project No.252102220033
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Multiple Corrugated Diaphragm(MCD) couplings, as a new type of flexible coupling, exhibit complex non-axisymmetric mechanical characteristics under angular loads due to their sinusoidal corrugated structure, posing challenges to traditional analytical methods. This paper aims to establish an efficient analytical model based on plate and shell theory to predict the stress distribution and angular stiffness of the MCD under angular loads. The study combines analytical methods with the finite element method (ANSYS), segments the corrugations, and establishes reasonable boundary conditions to derive analytical formulas for the deflection curve, stress distribution, and stiffness calculation at the maximum deformation section. The results show that the analytical model calculations are highly consistent with finite element simulations: the deflection curves follow similar trends, the stress distribution patterns generally match, and the angular stiffness calculation error is within 7%. The findings indicate that the established analytical model effectively captures the core mechanical behavior of the MCD, providing a reliable theoretical basis for the rapid design and optimization of high-performance MCD Couplings.

Indexed as

Analytical methodAngular loadPlate and shell theoryStiffness characteristicStress analysisThe multiple corrugated diaphragm

Identifiers

PMID41469426
PMCPMC12852724

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.