ArticleScientific reports2025
Stress and stiffness analysis of the multiple corrugated diaphragm under angular load based on plate and shell theory.
Article in Scientific reports, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
The Multiple Corrugated Diaphragm(MCD) couplings, as a new type of flexible coupling, exhibit complex non-axisymmetric mechanical characteristics under angular loads due to their sinusoidal corrugated structure, posing challenges to traditional analytical methods. This paper aims to establish an efficient analytical model based on plate and shell theory to predict the stress distribution and angular stiffness of the MCD under angular loads. The study combines analytical methods with the finite element method (ANSYS), segments the corrugations, and establishes reasonable boundary conditions to derive analytical formulas for the deflection curve, stress distribution, and stiffness calculation at the maximum deformation section. The results show that the analytical model calculations are highly consistent with finite element simulations: the deflection curves follow similar trends, the stress distribution patterns generally match, and the angular stiffness calculation error is within 7%. The findings indicate that the established analytical model effectively captures the core mechanical behavior of the MCD, providing a reliable theoretical basis for the rapid design and optimization of high-performance MCD Couplings.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.