ArticleNature communications2025
Application of kilohertz-frequency block to mitigate off-target motor effects of vagus nerve stimulation in swine.
Article in Nature communications, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The vagus nerve as a neurovisceral interface: a comprehensive review.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2026Review
- A standardized, surgically relevant map for emergence of organ-specific branches from the human vagus nerve.Brain stimulationArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Selective activation of small versus large diameter nerve fibers represents a broad challenge in the electrical modulation of neural activity for clinical applications. For example, off-target activation of motor nerve fibers was implicated in several failed vagus nerve stimulation (VNS) clinical trials by effectively limiting maximum applicable current amplitudes, thereby preventing robust activation of smaller diameter fibers responsible for therapeutic effects. Kilohertz high-frequency (HF) block is one of several strategies proposed to overcome this gap, but has yet to be thoroughly investigated in large, multifascicular, mixed nerves comparable in scale to humans. Here, we evaluated effects of HF block on the neural, muscular, and cardiac responses evoked by traditional low-frequency (LF) VNS in a large animal (swine) model. We found that HF selectively blocks neural fibers, and their associated physiological responses, in a size dependent manner with a high degree of specificity and establish initial thresholds for achieving block in large multifascicular nerves. Critically, we demonstrate that appropriately titrating HF amplitude can eliminate off-target LF-evoked motor responses while preserving activation of smaller diameter fibers targeted by clinical VNS. Beyond VNS, these data establish HF as a potentially viable strategy in any neuromodulation therapies where off-target activation of large diameter fibers limits therapeutic efficacy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.