ArticleZeitschrift fur medizinische Physik2026
Intensity modulation of frequency-specific optoacoustic stimulation at the peripheral hearing level.
Article in Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Medical optics in medical physics: from photons to quantitative insight.Zeitschrift fur medizinische Physik · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Laser light applied to the tympanic membrane (TM) induces mechanical vibrations that activate the auditory system. For controlled optoacoustic stimulation, a quantitative characterization of the mechanical properties of the TM and their relation to stimulation intensity is required. We therefore investigated which optical stimulation parameters induce vibratory amplitudes comparable to those caused by acoustic stimulation. TM vibration velocity was recorded ex vivo using a scanning laser Doppler vibrometer. Mechanical parameters of the TM, including effective compliance and exponential decay constants (τ), were determined from single-pulse laser stimulation. In addition, vibration amplitudes were quantified in response to sinusoidally amplitude-modulated laser pulse trains at different laser modulation rates (LMR). Laser modulation rates of 1, 2, 4, 8 and 10 kHz, and laser pulse repetition rates (LPR) of 32 kHz and 50 kHz were applied. Ex vivo measurements were compared with frequency-specific in vivo recordings from the central nucleus of the inferior colliculus (ICC). The extracted mechanical parameters, including compliance and τ, were consistent across stimulation conditions. Ex vivo measurements showed that the maximal displacement amplitude at the umbo decreased with increasing LMR and approached values comparable to those obtained with pure-tone acoustic stimulation up to 60 dB SPL. These intensity-dependent mechanical responses were reflected by corresponding neural activity at the ICC level in vivo, demonstrating consistent optoacoustic coupling across mechanical and physiological domains.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.