Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469076›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Laryngeal mask airway combined with visual bronchial blocker versus double-lumen tube for lung isolation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Yaodan Zhang, Tingting Li, Juan Wei, Rui Bao, Xin Lv, Jia-Feng Wang, Jingxiang Wu

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07117539 (Impact of Laryngeal Mask Combined With Visual Bronchial Blocker on Pharyngolaryngeal Injuries After Pulmonary Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07117539 nacompletednot on this map

Impact of Laryngeal Mask Combined With Visual Bronchial Blocker on Pharyngolaryngeal Injuries After Pulmonary Resection

TypeinterventionalSponsorTingting LiRan2025 to 2025Enrolled270ConditionsPulmonary NeoplasmArmsvisual bronchial blocker (VBB), double-lumen endotracheal tube (DLT)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Yaodan Zhang *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-3324-1861
Tingting Li *Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, Shanghai, China.
Juan Wei *Department of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital,School of Medicine,Tongji University, Shanghai, China.
Rui BaoChanghai Hospital, Shanghai, China.
Xin LvAnesthesiology, Tongji University Affiliated Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3352-7162
Jia-Feng WangChanghai Hospital, Shanghai, China.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1753-6499
Jingxiang WuDepartment of Anesthesiology, Shanghai Chest Hospital of Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, Shanghai, China wu_jingxiang@sjtu.edu.cn.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2858-9668

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionPostoperative sore throat and hoarseness are common complications following lung isolation with double-lumen tubes (DLTs) in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) combined with a visual bronchial blocker (VBB) may reduce airway trauma while maintaining effective lung isolation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial conducted at three major thoracic surgery centres in Shanghai, China. A total of 270 patients aged ≥18 years scheduled for elective VATS anatomical lung resection will be randomly allocated 1:1 to either the VBB group (n=135) using LMA combined with VBB or the DLT group (n=135) using conventional DLT (see Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram). The primary outcome is the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include sore throat and hoarseness at 1 and 48 hours, intraoperative device performance, lung collapse quality, intubation time, haemodynamic changes, emergence quality, device-related complications and hospital length of stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (KS24042). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07117539).

Indexed as

Intubation, IntratrachealLaryngeal MasksOne-Lung VentilationPostoperative ComplicationsThoracic Surgery, Video-AssistedAdultChinaFemaleHoarsenessHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPharyngitisProspective StudiesRandomized Controlled Trials as TopicSingle-Blind MethodAdult anaesthesiaAnaesthesia in oncologyThoracic surgery

Identifiers

PMID41469076
PMCPMC12766760

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.