ArticleBMJ open2025
Laryngeal mask airway combined with visual bronchial blocker versus double-lumen tube for lung isolation in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery: a protocol for a multicentre randomised controlled trial.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07117539 (Impact of Laryngeal Mask Combined With Visual Bronchial Blocker on Pharyngolaryngeal Injuries After Pulmonary Resection), which is not on this map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Impact of Laryngeal Mask Combined With Visual Bronchial Blocker on Pharyngolaryngeal Injuries After Pulmonary Resection
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Recent advances in thoracic anesthesia: lung protection, airway management, and enhanced recovery-a narrative review.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
introductionPostoperative sore throat and hoarseness are common complications following lung isolation with double-lumen tubes (DLTs) in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery (VATS). Laryngeal mask airway (LMA) combined with a visual bronchial blocker (VBB) may reduce airway trauma while maintaining effective lung isolation. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a prospective, randomised, controlled, single-blind, multicentre clinical trial conducted at three major thoracic surgery centres in Shanghai, China. A total of 270 patients aged ≥18 years scheduled for elective VATS anatomical lung resection will be randomly allocated 1:1 to either the VBB group (n=135) using LMA combined with VBB or the DLT group (n=135) using conventional DLT (see Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials diagram). The primary outcome is the incidence of sore throat and hoarseness at 24 hours postoperatively. Secondary outcomes include sore throat and hoarseness at 1 and 48 hours, intraoperative device performance, lung collapse quality, intubation time, haemodynamic changes, emergence quality, device-related complications and hospital length of stay. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of Shanghai Chest Hospital (KS24042). Results will be disseminated through peer-reviewed publications and conference presentations. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT07117539).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.