Evidence map›Paper›PMID 41469069›Full record

ArticleBMJ open2025

Multicentre prospective non-interventional study protocol for evaluating surgical strategies for Colorectal Resections and Postoperative Quality of Life in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients Across German-Speaking Sarcoma Centres (COLOSARC-Q).

Madelaine Hettler, Katrin R Scharpf, Anna Eich, Markus Albertsmeier, Anna Duprée, Svetlana Hetjens, Melissa Harbrücker, Franka Menge, Alexander Betzler, Peter Hohenberger and 1 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readClinical Trial Protocol
In one paragraph

Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06943612 (Colorectal Resections and Reconstructions in Patients With Retroperitoneal Sarcoma), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06943612 recruitingnot on this map

Colorectal Resections and Reconstructions in Patients With Retroperitoneal Sarcoma: Evaluation of Surgical Strategies and Postoperative Quality of Life

TypeobservationalSponsorHeidelberg UniversityRan2025 to 2026Enrolled120ConditionsSarcoma, Soft Tissue, Retroperitoneal Sarcoma
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Madelaine HettlerUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9728-2494
Katrin R ScharpfPsycho-Oncology Service in Cooperation with the Central Institute for Mental Health Mannheim, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Anna EichUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Markus AlbertsmeierDepartment of General, Visceral and Transplantation Surgery, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universitat München, Munich, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5028-5062
Anna DupréeDepartment of General, Visceral and Thoracic Surgery, University Medical Centre Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany.
Svetlana HetjensDepartment of Medical Statistics and Biomathematics, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Melissa HarbrückerUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Franka MengeUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Alexander BetzlerUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Peter HohenbergerUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany.
Jens JakobUniversity Medical Centre Mannheim, Department of Surgery, Sarcoma Unit, Heidelberg University Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Germany jens.jakob@umm.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8499-7172

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

introductionRetroperitoneal sarcomas (RPS) are rare and often large malignancies that frequently require extensive surgery for complete tumour removal. Resections of the colorectum are part of the standard resection, this way contributing to complication rates, including anastomotic leakage or obstruction. Surgical strategies for stoma formation and colorectal reconstruction remain poorly defined. The Colorectal Resections and Postoperative Quality of Life in Retroperitoneal Sarcoma Patients Across German-Speaking Sarcoma Centres (COLOSARC-Q) study aims to explore surgical procedures and health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in patients undergoing colorectal procedures during RPS surgery. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: COLOSARC-Q is a prospective, multicentre, non-interventional study and will recruit 120 patients with primary RPS who undergo colorectal resection as part of sarcoma surgery in a sarcoma referral centre in Germany or Switzerland. HRQoL is assessed using standardised questionnaires (EORTC QLQ-C30, QLQ-CR29) as well as semi-structured interviews by psycho-oncology services and patient advocates. Data will be collected via an electronic Case Report Form, encompassing demographic, clinical, surgical and outcome-related information. All data will be centrally analysed. For the assessment of quality of life, a qualitative analysis with content and context analysis, as well as evaluation of the questionnaires according to a standardised scoring system, is planned. The primary aim is to evaluate surgical techniques for bowel resection and reconstruction and their influence on the further course of disease. Secondary endpoints assess postoperative complications as well as tumour-, patient- and treatment-related factors. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Ethical approval was granted by the Ethics Committee II of the University of Heidelberg (approval number 2024-562; 13 June 2024). The data protection review was approved by the data protection officer of the University of Heidelberg. Participation of other centres in the study requires local ethical approval. All patients will be required to sign an informed consent form. Results of primary and secondary endpoints will be published. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBERS: NCT06943612; German Clinical Trials Registry (DRKS00034135).

Indexed as

Quality of LifeRetroperitoneal NeoplasmsSarcomaFemaleGermanyHumansMaleMulticenter Studies as TopicPostoperative ComplicationsProspective StudiesSurveys and QuestionnairesSwitzerlandQuality of LifeSarcomaSURGERY

Identifiers

PMID41469069
PMCPMC12766825

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.