ArticleBMJ open2025
Health facilities readiness and associated factors to provide growth monitoring services in low-income and middle-income countries: evidence from national service provision assessment surveys of six countries.
Article in BMJ open, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesMalnutrition among under-5 children is a major challenge in low-income and middle-income countries, contributing to poor growth and development. Growth monitoring and promotion (GMP) is recommended by WHO for early detection, yet its implementation remains weak due to limited resources and health system gaps. While many studies focus on utilisation, little is known about facility readiness, especially from multicountry analyses. This study aimed to assess the readiness of health facilities to provide growth monitoring (GM) service and associated factors using nationally representative data.
designSecondary analysis of existing cross-sectional survey data.
settingSecondary data from service provision assessment surveys of Afghanistan, Bangladesh, Ethiopia, Haiti, Nepal and Tanzania was used. PARTICIPANTS AND OUTCOME MEASURE: We included 6595 health facilities, which have complete information. Health facilities' readiness score was constructed as a counting score with regard to the availability of essential indicators required to provide GM services by using WHO service availability and readiness assessment.
resultAmong 6595 health facilities, 28.5% (95% CI 27.4% to 29.6%) of the facilities reported at least 75% of the relevant items for GM service provision. The factors associated with health facilities' readiness to provide GM service were quality assurance activities (incident rate ratio (IRR): 1.15; 95% CI 1.07 to 1.24), separate user fees (IRR: 1.10; 95% CI 1.00 to 1.20), fixed user fees (IRR: 1.20; 95% CI 1.10 to 1.31) and presence of trained health provider at facility 24 hours (IRR: 1.09; 95% CI 1.02 to 1.17).
conclusionsHealth facilities in six countries showed low readiness for GMP services. Strengthening facility capacity, staffing, equipment and quality assurance is essential to improve readiness.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.